Re: [nvo3] Draft NVO3 WG Charter

[John E Drake <[e-mail]>]

Robert,

Although we might disagree wrt the applicability of certain technologies, such as LISP, I think you are reinforcing my point that there are lots of existing IETF technologies that should be evaluated.

Thanks,

John 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Raszuk [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 9:53 AM
> To: John E Drake
> Cc: [e-mail]; Ronald Bonica; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]; Adrian Farrel; Nitin Bahadur
> Subject: Re: [nvo3] Draft NVO3 WG Charter
> 
> Hi John,
> 
> > Btw, are you aware of the VM mobility
> > draft:http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-raggarwa-data-center-
> mobility/?
> 
> The most interesting there is the section 6.2 attempting to propose
> ways
> to avoid inter-dc triangular routing after VM migration.
> 
> However I am not keen on host routes injection even in the limited
> radius (which may not be possible in hybrid cloud cases) nor NHRP
> proposal from section 6.2.3.
> 
> IMHO much better class of solutions are already documented in LISP
> and/or ILNP documents. They solve the same problem in much more elegant
> way. Note that those can be deployed within one's administration domain
> boundaries only or extend beyond given domain (for example to given
> domain's customers).
> 
> Many thx,
> R.