Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll for draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-08.txt

Hi Tal,

Thanks for your review.  Please see my responses inline.

Regards,
Ilango

From: Tal Mizrahi [mailto:tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 5:42 AM
To: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) <matthew.bocci@nokia.com>
Cc: NVO3 <nvo3@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll for draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-08.txt

Hi,

A couple of comments:

1.          I want to thank the authors for addressing the comments about the Security Considerations section of the previous version of the draft.

<Ilango> Glad to know that the new version addresses your previous comments on security considerations section.

2.       Regarding the IANA Considerations section:

a.       [RFC5226] was obsoleted by [RFC8126].

<Ilango> We will update the reference to [RFC8126]

b.       I believe that requiring “IETF Review” is too stringent; “Expert Review” would make more sense in my opinion.

 <Ilango>  We don’t see a good reason to change this policy. Only the range 0x00-0xFF is reserved for standardized options under IETF Review. We already have a large range (0x0100- 0xFFEF) that is available under a very lenient policy (First Come First Served),  so it is hard to see the overall policy as being too stringent.

Therefore, I would suggest the following change:

OLD:

The identifiers 0x0-0xFF are to be reserved for standardized options for allocation by IETF Review [RFC5226]

NEW:

The identifiers 0x0-0xFF are to be allocated by Expert Review, according to Section 4.5 of [RFC8126]

Cheers,
Tal.

On Tue, Oct 9, 2018, 12:08 Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) <matthew.bocci@nokia.com<mailto:matthew.bocci@nokia.com>> wrote:
This email begins a two-week working group last call for draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-08.txt.
Please review the draft and post any comments to the NVO3 working group list. If you have read the latest version of the draft but have no comments and believe it is ready for publication as a standards track RFC, please also indicate so to the WG email list.

We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this document, please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from all the Authors and Contributors.
Currently there are two IPR disclosures against this document.
If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

This poll will run until Friday 26th October.

Regards

Matthew and Sam
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
nvo3@ietf.org<mailto:nvo3@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3