Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll for draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-08.txt
Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Tue, 16 October 2018 01:01 UTC
Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB0EE126F72; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 18:01:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CWfU8e6RPCIM; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 18:01:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x243.google.com (mail-lj1-x243.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BDDA127332; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 18:01:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x243.google.com with SMTP id o14-v6so19254994ljj.2; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 18:01:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=EXGycry+auXeWHLKqIYWfrZBPiGXZ281zSPNsNgfyjQ=; b=Ou8m6x/nUH0o3l1LfyiibacSKsfGsTQxDhnmzkF8UdmvFEk5bd1ebcMZHh5LGG2gCF B5RJD/ZuLkdCvVlBtEdiYtBty4GTNv2EdKDTlWbFtRWiaQxAgBlIfNBJQeJHNYKsAWih vQ+fohZeAvdF5VmsxHIYF36lIThAwzB9tUjooVGtptMzdkNXSH9o4KimkuAVCUQvM+ql 5lxFOm7TZsqaZolUdFi4mjeP3Cz7vkrw5C/hnx8NyFl7fjorJpF4Sk8OcaJL3MDR5tA2 pXijDDF6PBmuZPDpAFrUJgVEsd2LX4BHPlrRI3GC79cBU3mpqbzkBKM5oVX6M+Y5HMiW 0c1A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EXGycry+auXeWHLKqIYWfrZBPiGXZ281zSPNsNgfyjQ=; b=rMKpbpj/x1gT5ZN6NvIpXB2ntz7GMatv1zTuzLVM9ym8vUzpMdGPeP+CrAdL8OjdaX Ghqto5kuc6r5XZFiHjtDm+ZqXxP/ZdvYwvbRTtsyuaDMUh7F1M6ZNXHi3QbiUmpBc7HM dZip/vcU6AX2zdOjQ5po1KlaQU+HG1ipYPajs4OuAIz0oFUzIW4QRfUCY6cvuzPwYvBY BaOPNw5PDV5uSELZORXTxTRM11fwUkj/grYQ90hVtR143C16A/bACcuRMh/nAysYGyHa bO+VJm7SkSqsQg1bzMDbapvJYBfluwFzt/xUaA8zlQbsrtq7CPBtw0FetIZwhvvuA55O 6R7g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfogZTfkvGng3uepsoU1OF7P5iKXozvpUak5JFTjuugox0XWWJsOG +Of9So/vM8ntVU2qcvwzoTYcfQR+9V9J9/PF2Oi9i0Dy
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV63OwMImY4SOYGE23LoyGT7126Lw6R+7u89AsG9qBtkzSzcQEi8ur+FF7gMtRjT+HZSOvaGZ0Zaimgdv6vVGqr4=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:360c:: with SMTP id d12-v6mr11214624lja.92.1539651687409; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 18:01:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <C35AB375-99DA-4629-8D67-D8991FF69434@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <C35AB375-99DA-4629-8D67-D8991FF69434@nokia.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 18:01:16 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmXLXerc7CmsT71XK31CL-Hd75tm=vw9te5=4+7jvea_og@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" <matthew.bocci@nokia.com>
Cc: NVO3 <nvo3@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e7efe805784e1748"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nvo3/YBr_rFIH2MzXGBSEMTwcnU7LFF0>
Subject: Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll for draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-08.txt
X-BeenThere: nvo3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Network Virtualization Overlays \(NVO3\) Working Group" <nvo3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nvo3/>
List-Post: <mailto:nvo3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 01:01:34 -0000
Dear All, I am concerned that the current definition of O-bit contradicts the definition of the Protocol Type field. Consider that O-bit defined as: O (1 bit): OAM packet. This packet contains a control message instead of a data payload. My interpretation, please correct me if it is wrong, is that the O-bit indicates that a message that immediately follows the Geneve header is OAM command or data. But that is what the Protocol Type field is for: Protocol Type (16 bits): The type of the protocol data unit appearing after the Geneve header. What is the precedence processing O-bit and the Protocol Type values? Should the specification explain how to interpret the value of the Protocol type field when O-bit is set? If the value of the Protocol Type field is equivalent to None, i.e., no message following the Geneve header, can O-bit be set to indicate that one of TLVs includes OAM? If that is the valid case, then the current definition of O-bit is not complete as it does not mention OAM in TLV case. And I have to point to an overall lack of discussion of OAM in the specification. Regards, Greg On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 2:08 AM Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) < matthew.bocci@nokia.com> wrote: > This email begins a two-week working group last call for > draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-08.txt. > > Please review the draft and post any comments to the NVO3 working group > list. If you have read the latest version of the draft but have no comments > and believe it is ready for publication as a standards track RFC, please > also indicate so to the WG email list. > > > > We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to > this document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with > IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > > If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this document, please > respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any > relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from > all the Authors and Contributors. > > Currently there are two IPR disclosures against this document. > > If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please > explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been > disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > > > > This poll will run until Friday 26th October. > > > > Regards > > > > Matthew and Sam > _______________________________________________ > nvo3 mailing list > nvo3@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 >
- [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll for d… Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… T. Sridhar
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Jesse Gross
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Ganga, Ilango S
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Ganga, Ilango S
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Daniel Migault
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… T. Sridhar
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Jon Hudson
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Anoop Ghanwani
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Ganga, Ilango S
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Daniel Migault
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Jesse Gross
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Jesse Gross
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Jesse Gross
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Ganga, Ilango S
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Anoop Ghanwani
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Ganga, Ilango S
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Daniel Migault
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Tal Mizrahi
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Chris Wright
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Dinesh Dutt
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Ganga, Ilango S
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Ganga, Ilango S
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Jesse Gross
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Jesse Gross
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Jesse Gross
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Jesse Gross
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Pankaj Garg
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Daniel Migault
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Daniel Migault
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Daniel Migault
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Daniel Migault
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Ganga, Ilango S
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Daniel Migault
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Ganga, Ilango S
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Ganga, Ilango S
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Joel Halpern Direct
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Daniel Migault
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Daniel Migault
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Ganga, Ilango S
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Ganga, Ilango S
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Daniel Migault
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Daniel Migault
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Ganga, Ilango S
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Ganga, Ilango S
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Daniel Migault
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Daniel Migault
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Daniel Migault
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Jesse Gross
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Joe Touch
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Daniel Migault
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Daniel Migault
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Joe Touch
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Daniel Migault
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Joe Touch
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Daniel Migault
- Re: [nvo3] Working Group Last Call and IPR Poll f… Jesse Gross