Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WRAP

I guess I must admit I'm a bit surprised that the general consensus
would be to merge with/profile WRAP as OAuth, as the deltas between the
two protocols as defined seems quite substantial. Does this mean that
for all intents and purposes I should consider the existing OAuth IETF
drafts to date to be deprecated in favour of WRAP?

Paul

On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 19:46 +0000, Dick Hardt wrote:
> Good question. Given the positive reception WRAP received at IIW and  
> that capabilities in WRAP are expected to come out of the work in the  
> IETF OAuth WG, there was consensus from the OAuth community to include  
> WRAP as OAuth profiles.
> 
> -- Dick
> 
> On 2009-11-10, at 10:06 AM, "Paul C. Bryan" <email@pbryan.net> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Dick:
> >
> > Given that WRAP is so different from OAuth (as I know it), other than
> > the fact that OAuth could be used to negotiate the issuance of a WRAP
> > refresh token, I'm curious why you chose to associate this with  
> > OAuth by
> > giving it an "OAuth" prefix. It seems to me that it would only create
> > confusion in this space.
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 17:52 +0000, Dick Hardt wrote:
> >> At IIW last week, myself, Biran Eaton from Google and Allen Tom from
> >> Yahoo! presented what is now called OAuth WRAP
> >>
> >> The specs and discussion specific to those documents is at:
> >>
> >>    http://groups.google.com/group/oauth-wrap-wg
> >>
> >> We plan to submit the document as an I-D next week when I-D  
> >> submission
> >> is open again, and for further work to occur in the IETF OAuth WG.
> >>
> >> -- Dick
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> OAuth mailing list
> >> OAuth@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OAuth mailing list
> > OAuth@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
> >