IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] multi-level delegation (was: Re: why are we signing?; OAuth 2.0 / Charter)

"Zeltsan, Zachary (Zachary)" <zachary.zeltsan@alcatel-lucent.com> Fri, 04 December 2009 12:40 UTC

Return-Path: <zachary.zeltsan@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F01B3A6A00 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 04:40:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RS8pJ+7IxQC8 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 04:40:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ihemail3.lucent.com (ihemail3.lucent.com [135.245.0.37]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07BDC3A68CC for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 04:40:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ihrh1.emsr.lucent.com (h135-1-218-53.lucent.com [135.1.218.53]) by ihemail3.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id nB4CdnYh003594; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 06:39:49 -0600 (CST)
Received: from USNAVSXCHHUB02.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsxchhub02.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.111]) by ihrh1.emsr.lucent.com (8.13.8/emsr) with ESMTP id nB4CdmuU017438; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 06:39:49 -0600 (CST)
Received: from USNAVSXCHMBSA3.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.3.39.119]) by USNAVSXCHHUB02.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.3.39.111]) with mapi; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 06:39:48 -0600
From: "Zeltsan, Zachary (Zachary)" <zachary.zeltsan@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 06:39:47 -0600
Thread-Topic: multi-level delegation (was: Re: [OAUTH-WG] why are we signing?; OAuth 2.0 / Charter)
Thread-Index: Acp0YahaKEAqTquHTmmijFGiYlF56gAeMnHA
Message-ID: <5710F82C0E73B04FA559560098BF95B124EEBB8994@USNAVSXCHMBSA3.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <daf5b9570911082102u215dcf22gf0aeb2f3578e5ea0@mail.gmail.com> <daf5b9570911111754u49f72a0aia59814b5da497a51@mail.gmail.com> <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343785102B49@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET> <cb5f7a380911120745w2f576d1ej300723581e50f03f@mail.gmail.com> <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343785102E58@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET> <cb5f7a380911130837q40d07388y1ae9b472be0ae57a@mail.gmail.com> <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343785102F1F@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET> <A4E79C63-7B5C-4FBA-9DDA-5FEB35B9584D@microsoft.com> <a9d9121c0911301432y76487b39hed670f0ed609c768@mail.gmail.com> <cb5f7a380912010852j3251199dse8d10da469dafa@mail.gmail.com> <a9d9121c0912011022p746e187fn1ff8240dbcdde096@mail.gmail.com> <5710F82C0E73B04FA559560098BF95B124EEB6B910@USNAVSXCHMBSA3.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com> <4B1830FA.7000402@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <4B1830FA.7000402@stpeter.im>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.37
Cc: Hardt <Dick.Hardt@microsoft.com>, Dick, "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] multi-level delegation (was: Re: why are we signing?; OAuth 2.0 / Charter)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:40:04 -0000

 
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> <hat type='chair'/>
> 
[....] 
> Without getting into the whole issue of re-chartering (yet), 
> I do think it would be helpful to have more discussion about 
> the draft you mention (because we know that multi-level 
> delegation, formerly known as "four-legged auth", is 
> something that people are interested in). Feel free to start 
> a separate thread about that, or reply to this message.
> Peter

It is also my impression that there is interest in multi-level delegation. 
As you have suggested, Bart Vrancken has just started such a thread (Subject: multi-level delegation).

Zachary

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email