Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Wed, 09 May 2012 18:37 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A128321F8547 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 May 2012 11:37:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wIwmWK0NQ35L for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 May 2012 11:37:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B1F7221F852A for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 May 2012 11:37:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 09 May 2012 18:37:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (EHLO [107.17.145.89]) [216.141.82.2] by mail.gmx.net (mp001) with SMTP; 09 May 2012 20:37:19 +0200
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX189DmJqCvw9Xh2E1J1JznuE7anrTDR/67ZLBzSXMo glJqSURoHthNNw
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <0CBAEB56DDB3A140BA8E8C124C04ECA2010259C4@P3PWEX2MB008.ex2.secureserver.net>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 21:37:16 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6CE569CC-091C-456D-8426-FB3200ED4667@gmx.net>
References: <0E17EDDE-567A-40BF-9CB9-0D6B757FF0A5@gmx.net> <0CBAEB56DDB3A140BA8E8C124C04ECA2010259C4@P3PWEX2MB008.ex2.secureserver.net>
To: Eran Hammer <eran@hueniverse.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org WG" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 18:37:21 -0000

Hi Eran, 

if you care about the specification (and want to use it in your products) then you may want to reach out to your IPR folks and ask for their judgement. 
They may be able to tell you whether they find the cited IPR applicable and whether they had experience with the IPR holder already. 

Ciao
Hannes

On May 9, 2012, at 8:51 PM, Eran Hammer wrote:

> What exactly is the expected WG discussion on this? I hope people here are not expected to read the patent and make legal decisions about the patent's validity or even applicability as these are questions for lawyers, not engineers.
> 
> EH
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
>> Of Hannes Tschofenig
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 10:44 AM
>> To: oauth@ietf.org WG
>> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> an IPR disclosure had been submitted for the OAuth bearer document
>> recently. In case you may have missed it, here is the link to it:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1752/
>> 
>> The ADs will re-run the IETF last call due to this new IPR filing and we would
>> also like the working group to check the IPR and to think about potential
>> implications.
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> Ciao
>> Hannes & Derek
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth