IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] Fingerprints

Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net> Sat, 11 April 2015 15:42 UTC

Return-Path: <calestyo@scientia.net>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 465611B2BE7 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 08:42:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.3
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_95=3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oEf84tPN1Izh for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 08:42:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw01.dd24.net (mailgw-01.dd24.net [193.46.215.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8007A1B2BE6 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 08:42:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailpolicy-01.live.igb.homer.key-systems.net (mailpolicy-02.live.igb.homer.key-systems.net [192.168.1.27]) by mailgw01.dd24.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8C25FB41 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 15:42:17 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mailpolicy-02.live.igb.homer.key-systems.net
Received: from mailgw01.dd24.net ([192.168.1.35]) by mailpolicy-01.live.igb.homer.key-systems.net (mailpolicy-02.live.igb.homer.key-systems.net [192.168.1.25]) (amavisd-new, port 10235) with ESMTP id io8f9tYvAzZd for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 15:42:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from heisenberg.fritz.box (ppp-188-174-180-118.dynamic.mnet-online.de [188.174.180.118]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailgw01.dd24.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 15:42:15 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <1428766935.4956.0.camel@scientia.net>
From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net>
To: openpgp@ietf.org
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 17:42:15 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87vbh3ndrb.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de>
References: <CAMm+LwhbB+-MnGRBCvprgAGOuu+5CJ2rgod7EBGOQR5UNVrspQ@mail.gmail.com> <87y4m0ozlt.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de> <1428701837.6212.145.camel@scientia.net> <87vbh3ndrb.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="sha-512"; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; boundary="=-XUH6eojrOFMF/EhGBKAO"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/3twKjjoHxizGz02bWmi72MhgJxM>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Fingerprints
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 15:42:21 -0000

On Sat, 2015-04-11 at 12:46 +0200, Werner Koch wrote: 
> > Why? Isn't that exactly what the past has taught us? That using one
> > fixed fingerprint algo leads into all kinds of troubles?
> Trouble with a fingerprint?  I am interested to hear about such a case.
> (ssh's default use of MD5 does not count).
Isn't it one main reasons for all these efforts now to get rid of SHA1
on OpenPGP?

Cheers,
Chris.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email