IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] Fingerprints

Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net> Mon, 13 April 2015 15:40 UTC

Return-Path: <calestyo@scientia.net>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BEF41ACD97 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:40:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TEH6eBIcbvm7 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:40:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw01.dd24.net (mailgw-01.dd24.net [193.46.215.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9570D1ACD9C for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:40:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailpolicy-01.live.igb.homer.key-systems.net (mailpolicy-02.live.igb.homer.key-systems.net [192.168.1.27]) by mailgw01.dd24.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF86F5FB09 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 15:40:53 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mailpolicy-02.live.igb.homer.key-systems.net
Received: from mailgw01.dd24.net ([192.168.1.35]) by mailpolicy-01.live.igb.homer.key-systems.net (mailpolicy-02.live.igb.homer.key-systems.net [192.168.1.25]) (amavisd-new, port 10235) with ESMTP id 0VPVhJgyuIRT for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 15:40:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from heisenberg.fritz.box (ppp-93-104-124-136.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.124.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailgw01.dd24.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 15:40:45 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <1428939645.12460.1.camel@scientia.net>
From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net>
To: "openpgp@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 17:40:45 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87sic4jwzx.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de>
References: <CAMm+LwhbB+-MnGRBCvprgAGOuu+5CJ2rgod7EBGOQR5UNVrspQ@mail.gmail.com> <87y4m0ozlt.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de> <sjmk2xkf2t8.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <CA+cU71=M2JzBkJXgUYCgp=Q=0c_7UuZWY14myA6cpMRwKt+Hjg@mail.gmail.com> <87sic4jwzx.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="sha-512"; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; boundary="=-h1Vr9cM5k9WU4xQKEqJd"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/k6LSnASMGmLnU0FxNTUFiLkt2oc>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Fingerprints
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 15:40:58 -0000

On Mon, 2015-04-13 at 09:41 +0200, Werner Koch wrote: 
> That would require a new key packet format anyway and any old key can't
> be used with that.
Wouldn't it be possible to make that completely independent of the used
fingerprint?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email