Re: [openpgp] Fingerprints

Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net> Mon, 20 April 2015 15:25 UTC

Return-Path: <calestyo@scientia.net>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8D6B1B2E4F for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:25:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jpXm9RCZU3ac for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:25:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw02.dd24.net (mailgw-02.dd24.net [193.46.215.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A33D1B2EBB for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:25:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailpolicy-01.live.igb.homer.key-systems.net (mailpolicy-02.live.igb.homer.key-systems.net [192.168.1.27]) by mailgw02.dd24.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0A815FAD3 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 15:25:37 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mailpolicy-02.live.igb.homer.key-systems.net
Received: from mailgw02.dd24.net ([192.168.1.36]) by mailpolicy-01.live.igb.homer.key-systems.net (mailpolicy-02.live.igb.homer.key-systems.net [192.168.1.25]) (amavisd-new, port 10236) with ESMTP id UTy1dC4ImTMu for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 15:25:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from heisenberg.fritz.box (ppp-188-174-18-198.dynamic.mnet-online.de [188.174.18.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailgw02.dd24.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 15:25:35 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <1429543533.24823.73.camel@scientia.net>
From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net>
To: openpgp@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 17:25:33 +0200
In-Reply-To: <sjmlhhmakxp.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org>
References: <CAMm+LwhbB+-MnGRBCvprgAGOuu+5CJ2rgod7EBGOQR5UNVrspQ@mail.gmail.com> <87d232lkb6.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> <sjmlhhmakxp.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="sha-512"; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; boundary="=-Y2YysAxhWkBNzVGb4aGc"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/ak-x6hBg1XNtTVMiB885YFW1rPA>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Fingerprints
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 15:25:41 -0000

On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 11:17 -0400, Derek Atkins wrote: 
> >  * what material gets digested; at a minmum, this is:
> >     - the algorithm for the key (incl. any parameters)
> >     - public key values (mpi's, bitstrings)
> >       it's not clear to me that there is any advantage to adding
> >       anything else here.
> 
> I still believe that the creation time (and key expiration time, if it
> exists) should be included.
I think the same accounts for the key usage flags. Or actually, we
should perhaps make primary keys to be generally certifying-only keys.

And specifying a expiration time (even if it's 0) should be mandatory.

Cheers.