IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] Fingerprints

Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net> Wed, 15 April 2015 23:03 UTC

Return-Path: <calestyo@scientia.net>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ED4B1AC3ED for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 16:03:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id prrr8ypL4x1i for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 16:03:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw02.dd24.net (mailgw-02.dd24.net [193.46.215.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BF581AC3EC for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 16:03:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailpolicy-01.live.igb.homer.key-systems.net (mailpolicy-01.live.igb.homer.key-systems.net [192.168.1.26]) by mailgw02.dd24.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE91A5FB4B for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 23:03:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mailpolicy-01.live.igb.homer.key-systems.net
Received: from mailgw02.dd24.net ([192.168.1.36]) by mailpolicy-01.live.igb.homer.key-systems.net (mailpolicy-01.live.igb.homer.key-systems.net [192.168.1.25]) (amavisd-new, port 10236) with ESMTP id nqLpCOyBJTp1 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 23:03:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from heisenberg.fritz.box (ppp-93-104-124-136.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.124.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailgw02.dd24.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 23:03:05 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <1429138983.1702.62.camel@scientia.net>
From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net>
To: openpgp@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 01:03:03 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+Lwg_1HfPQZy8W7b5KhOBbuz1aZUBSUBanHsTp=ZkJAUO7Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMm+LwhbB+-MnGRBCvprgAGOuu+5CJ2rgod7EBGOQR5UNVrspQ@mail.gmail.com> <87y4m0ozlt.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de> <sjmk2xkf2t8.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <CA+cU71=M2JzBkJXgUYCgp=Q=0c_7UuZWY14myA6cpMRwKt+Hjg@mail.gmail.com> <87sic4jwzx.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de> <1428939645.12460.1.camel@scientia.net> <CAMm+LwigZ2raZDdBQ1CLdUE0iuhfnBvTj6M=5bWHkGdxXcYG_w@mail.gmail.com> <552C03CF.3020001@iang.org> <CAMm+Lwg_1HfPQZy8W7b5KhOBbuz1aZUBSUBanHsTp=ZkJAUO7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="sha-512"; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; boundary="=-qZA0N+n4UqElZCmNsUKB"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/tp45s03FkqaUgKEJ9iZUl_k1aDA>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Fingerprints
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 23:03:10 -0000

On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 20:36 -0400, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: 
> It makes no difference to the security
Are sure with that? I thought to have once stumbled across some paper
which seemed to imply that a truncation leads to issues.
Can't find it right now, though,... so maybe my mind just betrays me.

Cheers.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email