IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-openpgp-rfc4880bis

Kristian Fiskerstrand <kristian.fiskerstrand@sumptuouscapital.com> Mon, 27 June 2016 16:45 UTC

Return-Path: <kristian.fiskerstrand@sumptuouscapital.com>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2689A12D825 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 09:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.935
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.935 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sumptuouscapital-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ErROmHgi6lFw for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 09:45:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x236.google.com (mail-lf0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D38912D81F for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 09:45:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x236.google.com with SMTP id f6so159947004lfg.0 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 09:45:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sumptuouscapital-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=/u1UPqf076IBEJsjqz2SZj85EtII8KlfXFoP1vUQpJE=; b=pzeHXTNCWH/bCXlhYVjRJSxYsNAvt/9iWA+2GRGtV/niAy47ehhXrTFoFZd+fefj0Q RYxYeoNnJXnqrtFxOXju3tacW6gbRdmkkVCSy91wkcNYgagBVNmOgFRIUjeFeo0iVplC Va3PQruUG3rqUEneuNyb3NZcJ2AR2Vvzl5mLbzI7sfmGvpeolShSQ1R4mS0J53rrm6/Z d2SGgomgObnHJn79kaIWfruF1HhZAZIBMYRhvSQAfAWPEeIF5OqJSsFNtMNRq5uuCEYt zCnO29xJ8ojx+oP+0bboa8l+3ogfZRrk/DgRPLe5u7qmpfNpUKm5by+hsUqejVHdZuZK xPcw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=/u1UPqf076IBEJsjqz2SZj85EtII8KlfXFoP1vUQpJE=; b=UaTO3XyRNh1KTVX9oYc7QCdPdXtHU4xrXQUY1kSQdELIbtiBSsbWS1ILWDDC1EzRsH JnR/iSsC0+gjjHIsTGEviB45ciSogWD3gp51u8AndDb1qa9wPGEktCFDl0NHM/ScvLik 4zZH2/WdPyV3TgV3Jp9zxEQ0GI92o8Lo4d4dUF0lETX22Mm3NgAje7AyB1Loi1b3Tvu4 eM9LCPv4Sv0Jo6lGCjxaauLtxjyQvDJEjY1kb9rUFo/lliCicL3syPK/Lw5slyjXE1ca B/h+WljAhlif5ybadJMBtUfH9TmE3aXjKVKB3zVwFz8n98cs3UHFkVucMKNZ9GkRooFJ yvog==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJKYRF0ezsgcGk0MtFdncHDzgxP5TXr6kG2ANdrHNiLsE333t9wYENVoRNgprwr9w==
X-Received: by 10.25.149.6 with SMTP id x6mr565993lfd.106.1467045944267; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 09:45:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.144.0.7] (host-37-191-220-247.lynet.no. [37.191.220.247]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 5sm3399009lja.34.2016.06.27.09.45.42 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 27 Jun 2016 09:45:42 -0700 (PDT)
To: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
References: <878txtjnf6.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> <sjmeg7ivbuu.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org>
From: Kristian Fiskerstrand <kristian.fiskerstrand@sumptuouscapital.com>
Message-ID: <8b0200bf-16a9-76e6-71e7-b2fe445257d2@sumptuouscapital.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 18:45:39 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <sjmeg7ivbuu.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FHbpHESFojgAaIwocd6G5eTr7UMs0LNO7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/CPPpbMj3_Qxu6bcYaFMwTwrM4PE>
Cc: IETF OpenPGP <openpgp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-openpgp-rfc4880bis
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 16:45:49 -0000

On 06/27/2016 06:24 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm in favor of accepting this.
> 
> I'll also point out that I had made another suggested update on April 14
> (Subject: Proposed Patch to RFC4880bis to reserve two public key
> numbers) which has not been incorporated into the document.

There seems to be a lot of doubt about the security of Algebraic Eraser
protocols (at least controversy) and little research compared to other
key exchange methods,  without much gain from implementing it. What
would be the rationale for adding it?

-- 
----------------------------
Kristian Fiskerstrand
Blog: https://blog.sumptuouscapital.com
Twitter: @krifisk
----------------------------
Public OpenPGP certificate at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
----------------------------
Aurum est Potestas
Gold is power

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status