Re: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-openpgp-rfc4880bis

Given the responses so far, I think we have enough "yes, adopt"
comments to go forward.  So there's no need for more "yes" responses.
Please post any *objections* by Wednesday, 6 July.

Thanks,
Barry, as chair

On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
<dkg@fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
> hey OpenPGP folks--
>
> We've had a slow start on 4880bis, but i'm hoping we can get things
> moving again.  One of the things we need to do bureaucratically is to
> officially adopt a specific draft as the basis of our ongoing work.
>
> Werner Koch has prepared and submitted the beginnings of the new
> revision of RFC 4880, the current version of which you can see here:
>
>    https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-koch-openpgp-rfc4880bis-02
>
> This is a call for adoption of this draft by the OpenPGP WG.  Please
> speak up soon if you have any concerns, or if you think this document
> should not be adopted by the WG for some reason.  Please also speak up
> if you are in favor of adoption.
>
> A brief reminder of what adoption by the WG would mean:
>
>  * this draft would become the *starting point* for RFC 4880bis; the
>    draft is currently not complete, but it would be the basis upon which
>    the group would build the new proposal.
>
>  * Werner Koch would be the document editor, but the decisions about the
>    draft would be made by the working group.  I want to thank Werner for
>    his willingness to put in his time as the document editor.
>
>  * Since our charter (https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/openpgp/charter/)
>    is aimed primarily at making a revision to RFC 4880, we would
>    hopefully focus our efforts on contributing review and amendments to
>    this draft, with a goal of driving it to IETF Last Call within the
>    year.
>
> Please give feedback on draft adoption!
>
>    --dkg
>
> _______________________________________________
> openpgp mailing list
> openpgp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp
>