Re: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-openpgp-rfc4880bis

Barry Leiba <> Sun, 03 July 2016 13:11 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id C439312D140 for <>; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 06:11:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.401
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.198, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yz2pK3YDDpyM for <>; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 06:11:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5B6112D133 for <>; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 06:11:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id g4so4252677ith.1 for <>; Sun, 03 Jul 2016 06:11:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=TO4YXy2FcbDJz6Tb4ZMJ7dNK5Ye35NHni8Y2cEfPXm0=; b=tmHBVdnrDt1kmnXZoB9K02Qc2eME6mEXDK0L1hC5cToSfvSP/X3s5BT7MzBjar0axB 72ASFg+zL1zphN3/JC20ZBlDr3YnbGBDuD0kdTWsPMXx1NK05hYy8mFZCU0GHUfRo/pt hJeIazcBSRtznq+1QC9nvBhzy5y5nQmcxlCYweTuw0qNVi6tgydBhDXVUHCxd35Af+v6 OlS5Xkd776ktxE3tze7ZV26WI5LHEvn1bkuw9LC2bKrr72N+5NhdkTXG2KHgujwxgfgG Cu0VO/3/YP6mtYVtg+N+bz8o4mjP8Rdee96OXm0MInT1OzrsYCcT83KwXjwZL/AIa2jz JtUA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=TO4YXy2FcbDJz6Tb4ZMJ7dNK5Ye35NHni8Y2cEfPXm0=; b=D4JkEkWJ0Dt8+r2JiE9YzD3z9E+j5j0frJ0XqpwOm5KlSbAfaF0PkJtu0w/mGb4RNH 21bTYdGjNWcuo9KZChHylTJdA/nXWL6rqDX0FJi5NUbHhvE01aXNlWu2v0pg388o3GMD pTq6NEeufvMXa3SV+sqAoxqKgdioAOn93XbsWuAT4wRuor9dM0WXTKQtaIuGCihFuT8F OkbSFxnIDWrNYjq7yieypOEmJu3Eq39xrsSVIcQ3L28DQmqxkyCxQIaMymNVqsl7WVml tmppt8QN/yTwU5ZpR3B7uZhRpFrNKpaduU11FzwbcAIwBt8n2fvDB9c8bKZ2H784pgga oUNw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKyKQbYCSF/ei0Oto8QRhZyPCly/Eq5sWZfxLtxysPLEpAZt3UZV27fbfet4iIXd6ONRIwQgcKHZCt66A==
X-Received: by with SMTP id 132mr1725710itz.76.1467551481016; Sun, 03 Jul 2016 06:11:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 06:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>
From: Barry Leiba <>
Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2016 09:11:20 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: MAE9507mu_cr20PKbN2PSJvEpnE
Message-ID: <>
To: IETF OpenPGP <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-openpgp-rfc4880bis
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2016 13:11:24 -0000

Given the responses so far, I think we have enough "yes, adopt"
comments to go forward.  So there's no need for more "yes" responses.
Please post any *objections* by Wednesday, 6 July.

Barry, as chair

On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
<> wrote:
> hey OpenPGP folks--
> We've had a slow start on 4880bis, but i'm hoping we can get things
> moving again.  One of the things we need to do bureaucratically is to
> officially adopt a specific draft as the basis of our ongoing work.
> Werner Koch has prepared and submitted the beginnings of the new
> revision of RFC 4880, the current version of which you can see here:
> This is a call for adoption of this draft by the OpenPGP WG.  Please
> speak up soon if you have any concerns, or if you think this document
> should not be adopted by the WG for some reason.  Please also speak up
> if you are in favor of adoption.
> A brief reminder of what adoption by the WG would mean:
>  * this draft would become the *starting point* for RFC 4880bis; the
>    draft is currently not complete, but it would be the basis upon which
>    the group would build the new proposal.
>  * Werner Koch would be the document editor, but the decisions about the
>    draft would be made by the working group.  I want to thank Werner for
>    his willingness to put in his time as the document editor.
>  * Since our charter (
>    is aimed primarily at making a revision to RFC 4880, we would
>    hopefully focus our efforts on contributing review and amendments to
>    this draft, with a goal of driving it to IETF Last Call within the
>    year.
> Please give feedback on draft adoption!
>    --dkg
> _______________________________________________
> openpgp mailing list