Re: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Fri, 05 February 2016 16:35 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8360F1B320E; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 08:35:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UIaIpEXyIpR2; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 08:34:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E3271B317F; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 08:34:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5492; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1454690098; x=1455899698; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=qNvRceY0Svj0XsBIuVjEPCsoWwQdHgYkZG5frKAyjKA=; b=UPTo0dn6UADTvNIFaipQPmz14WPmvj4wBHqOHcWAZj9CFX0QeNZxVzf8 Qay9X1TeMDPzIh8Zs18u5C2n8ImCDxesipIEuUEAwiuy4J0C5h1vjgusm f3zdp6BKBzdcupGIVJOkqnt6idl8/4Z2aX32mHEpJEMe4LLX+ZimKedw5 o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0D/AQC6zrRW/4ENJK1egm5MgT8GiFWue?= =?us-ascii?q?oITAQ2BZoYNAoE0OBQBAQEBAQEBgQqEQgEBBHkQAgEIPwcyFBECBAENBYgbv2k?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEVhhIBhDaIbAWNX4UPhAcBjU+BW40YhW6IT?= =?us-ascii?q?wEeAQFCg2RqiQB8AQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,401,1449532800"; d="scan'208,217";a="235513565"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 05 Feb 2016 16:34:57 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (xch-rcd-001.cisco.com [173.37.102.11]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u15GYvA8014098 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 5 Feb 2016 16:34:57 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 10:34:56 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 10:34:57 -0600
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>, "Manav Bhatia" <manavbhatia@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator
Thread-Index: AQHRGDvPHGJIFP17wUyU2okv88d/op6USjYAgABzQwCAAA5ggIAACJ2AgALsFQCAhXS9AIAAAgoAgAAGoYCAAHcEAIAACy0AgACeOQCAAB4hAIAAEe+AgAACQAD//7XhgA==
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 16:34:56 +0000
Message-ID: <D2DA3549.10D5FA%aretana@cisco.com>
References: <D252E730.385E8%acee@cisco.com> <CAG1kdojiU6fzn7XYSSdpfabxMDUQYvbgNNRCjZbraJKq2+WwJQ@mail.gmail.com> <D2668656.3CED2%acee@cisco.com> <c3caff28c3d243b99e523be8bc64719f@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com> <D2669DC6.3CF08%acee@cisco.com> <8ef4f51407804a91950ab126277368a6@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com> <D2691731.3D460%acee@cisco.com> <DBFC89CC-221C-42C8-8A11-E0E5A49170EC@cisco.com> <D2D90F1A.4B992%acee@cisco.com> <D055B8DB-8D78-4CEC-8E7F-90E9BD6E0A47@cisco.com> <CAG1kdohexHAJBRas53K7YB+U3yE_Nhy5FGd-n4vmr47dNMbU6A@mail.gmail.com> <D35900BF-2CD6-4FFB-B403-49C1210B7547@cisco.com> <D2DA067F.4BADD%acee@cisco.com> <8380eaf9fc1d4fb993d55cf3a95cc4bc@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com> <D2DA2F10.4BB3B%acee@cisco.com> <0154264405f54697befe72915d18616f@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <0154264405f54697befe72915d18616f@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.117.15.5]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D2DA354910D5FAaretanaciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/1qiuWzQXAzPwzmif3FOPy1VUOiE>
Cc: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>, "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator@ietf.org>, "bfd-chairs@ietf.org" <bfd-chairs@ietf.org>, "isis-wg@ietf.org list" <isis-wg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 16:35:00 -0000

On 2/5/16, 11:00 AM, "OSPF on behalf of Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ospf-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of ginsberg@cisco.com<mailto:ginsberg@cisco.com>> wrote:

Les:

Hi!

There is no discussion ongoing nor any action item for the authors that I am aware of.
I believe this state exists because we were waiting for discussion on the S-BFD base draft to be resolved.

If ADs require any additional updates they need to tell us - otherwise I think this draft should move forward as is.

As you well know, what is holding the ISIS draft is not work required from you (the authors of that document) -- at least not to clear the DISCUSS.

I am waiting for the BFD WG chairs to call consensus on the discussion related to the mapping, and on the authors of the base S-BFD document to provide an update reflecting that decision.  It may have not been clear to everyone what needed to happen as a result of the DISCUSS - I sent reminders to the chairs/authors a few minutes ago.

Thanks for not letting us forget about making progress..

Alvaro.