Re: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Thu, 04 February 2016 19:16 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FCB71ACDD8; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 11:16:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sZM2PPXK_aG2; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 11:16:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CD011ACDD6; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 11:16:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5419; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1454613406; x=1455823006; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=BUNpsR50TZcbv8C0jG2wr+iwy/9u6jjpvIMlt720ZwE=; b=CmT8eswBVeGrPziek8PG9MF1tLXVneZOz8MeKxIvRK3gxuPfVTtqwd/T 9vgmXSs2NPHQhIDZxCBXrUInZ/Y5k4qr857XP2rNG3ua2GUxXDZmVTuzO 5I6olBRfoHaBsJ3yiY4u+c2d/Ynaccep8rzIDKZUo5ayViJrW+WXs51om k=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 841
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0C0AgC1orNW/4gNJK1egm5MgTAPBohVr?= =?us-ascii?q?m6CEw6BZoYNAoE+OBQBAQEBAQEBgQqEQQEBAQMBI1YFCwIBCAQUKgICMiUCBA4?= =?us-ascii?q?FDogFCLF1jx0BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQENCIYSgW2CSocyK4EPBZJsh?= =?us-ascii?q?AUBgn2BY4hugVuNFopug1EBHgFDggMZgUhqhy58AQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,396,1449532800"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="73905813"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 04 Feb 2016 19:16:45 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com (xch-rtp-015.cisco.com [64.101.220.155]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u14JGiSL018663 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 4 Feb 2016 19:16:45 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 14:16:44 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 14:16:44 -0500
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator
Thread-Index: AQHRX4CVRGRf7e6ISkyrMJZ6tz0daw==
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 19:16:44 +0000
Message-ID: <DBFC89CC-221C-42C8-8A11-E0E5A49170EC@cisco.com>
References: <D252E730.385E8%acee@cisco.com> <CAG1kdojiU6fzn7XYSSdpfabxMDUQYvbgNNRCjZbraJKq2+WwJQ@mail.gmail.com> <D2668656.3CED2%acee@cisco.com> <c3caff28c3d243b99e523be8bc64719f@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com> <D2669DC6.3CF08%acee@cisco.com> <8ef4f51407804a91950ab126277368a6@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com> <D2691731.3D460%acee@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D2691731.3D460%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.82.214.67]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_93279AF2-0F34-4DF0-836C-CAD27B6121DF"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/m7uWTaZyTD3UVfuEcoo4NsdpgAs>
Cc: "draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator@ietf.org>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 19:16:47 -0000

Hi, Acee,

Following up on your note below regarding draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator, could you request publication and send this document to the IESG?

[BTW, its sibling document on ISIS is already in IESG ballot.]

Thanks!

— Carlos.

> On Nov 11, 2015, at 4:16 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> I was more concerned about the consumer of the information than the IGPs. I did look at base S-BFD draft and I agree this unspecified. Let’s go forward than with the proposed text and I will request publication.
> 
> Thanks,
> Acee
> 
>