Re: OSPF WG Charter Proposal

[Acee Lindem <[e-mail]>]

Naidu, Venkata wrote:

> Rohit,
>
> -> => 3. "OSPF TE" and "OSPF Hitless Restart" MIBs must be
> -> =>    considered as separate drafts. Recent OSPFv2 MIB only
> -> =>    talks about Opaque LSAs - but content carried in those
> -> =>    LSAs are not specified in any MIB. I am be willing
> -> =>    to write those drafts - what is your opinion, Kireeti/Padma ?
> ->
> -> I was considering reflecting OSPF-TE in a MIB too. And this could
> -> be a potential item for this or a future. But is there an operator
> -> burning for this stuff?
>
>   Yes :-) there are definite requests I encounter for OSPF-TE MIB.
>   If not Hitless Restart MIB, we do need OSPF-TE mib. As you know,
>   it is potential candidate for deployment in MPLS (apart from VPNs).
>
> -> =>
> -> => 4. "Flooding over Parallel Point-to-Point Links" can be
> -> =>    considered as an informational RFC.
> ->
> -> What draft are you referring to?
>
>   draft-ietf-ospf-ppp-flood-01.txt


Venkata,

This draft has expired and I don't think there are any plans
to re-submit it.

>
> --
> Venkata.
>
>

Thanks,
--
Acee