IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: OSPF WG Charter Proposal

Jeff Parker <jparker@AXIOWAVE.COM> Thu, 07 November 2002 16:46 UTC

Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA01463 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 11:46:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from walnut (209.119.0.61) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <15.007B7BEB@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 11:48:44 -0500
Received: from DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM by DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 330067 for OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 11:48:44 -0500
Received: from 64.115.125.242 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0f) with TCP; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 11:48:44 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Message-ID: <EB5FFC72F183D411B38200062957342902A749C2@r2d2.axiowave.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 11:48:38 -0500
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
From: Jeff Parker <jparker@AXIOWAVE.COM>
Subject: Re: OSPF WG Charter Proposal
To: OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
Precedence: list

> As another example, implementations of PNNI
> signalling ranged from something like ten calls per second to several
> thousand calls per second.
>
> John

In the context of this discussion, I'm not sure which
of the two statements below you are making.  (#1?)

        "So efficient that we could make
        thousands of setups per second"
or
        "So out of control that we would make
        thousands of calls per second."

- jeff parker

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email