IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: OSPF WG Charter Proposal

Alex Zinin <zinin@PSG.COM> Sat, 09 November 2002 07:28 UTC

Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA13569 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 02:28:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from walnut (209.119.0.61) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <10.007BCDEE@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 2:31:21 -0500
Received: from DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM by DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 336065 for OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 02:31:20 -0500
Received: from 147.28.0.62 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0f) with TCP; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 02:31:20 -0500
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62] helo=127.0.0.1 ident=zinin) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #2) id 18AQ5O-000KK4-00; Fri, 08 Nov 2002 23:31:18 -0800
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.51) Personal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
References: <28F05913385EAC43AF019413F674A017123E50@OCCLUST04EVS1.ugd.att.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <2275709939.20021108233030@psg.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 23:30:30 -0800
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
From: Alex Zinin <zinin@PSG.COM>
Subject: Re: OSPF WG Charter Proposal
Comments: To: "Choudhury, Gagan L, ALASO" <gchoudhury@att.com>
Comments: cc: jmoy@sycamorenet.com
To: OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
In-Reply-To: <28F05913385EAC43AF019413F674A017123E50@OCCLUST04EVS1.ugd.att.com>
Precedence: list
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Gagan-

 [wg-member hat on]

 The charter already has 3 drafts that need to be finished and where I
 act as a co-author. Given my workload these days, adding more would
 be an obvious over-commitment on my side. Besides, the WG charter
 already has enough, I believe. Let's get something done first.

 There's two fine solutions to the problem, people can pick either
 of them and interoperate with no issues, so no hurry to get em
 RFC'ed.

--
Alex

Friday, November 08, 2002, 10:26:33 AM, Choudhury, Gagan L, ALASO wrote:
> Acee,
>    There used to be the following two drafts on Flooding Optimizations and I think they also used to be part of the charter.

> 1) A. Zinin and M. Shand, "Flooding Optimizations in Link-State
>    Routing Protocols,".

> 2) J. Moy, "Flooding over Parallel Point-to-Point Links,".

> Is there any effort to revive those ?  Alex, John any of you interested in following up on this ?

>                 Gagan Choudhury

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email