Re: OSPF WG Charter Proposal

"Manral, Vishwas" <VishwasM@NETPLANE.COM> Fri, 08 November 2002 08:52 UTC

Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA10823 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 03:52:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: from walnut (209.119.0.61) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <16.007BA4BC@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 3:54:49 -0500
Received: from DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM by DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 332709 for OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 03:54:48 -0500
Received: from 12.27.183.253 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0f) with TCP; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 03:54:48 -0500
Received: by XOVER.dedham.mindspeed.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <4B0HP9Y0>; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 03:54:48 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Message-ID: <E7E13AAF2F3ED41197C100508BD6A328791993@india_exch.hyderabad.mindspeed.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 03:56:46 -0500
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
From: "Manral, Vishwas" <VishwasM@NETPLANE.COM>
Subject: Re: OSPF WG Charter Proposal
To: OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
Precedence: list

Hi Dave,

   b) I think we have made it clear that we do not intend to fiddle with the
   protocol in the normal case, that is why we have not followed an approach
of
   basing the flooding on RTT unlike some other protocols.

> Actually, flooding based on RTT can certainly be done without
> "fiddling with the protocol" (assuming that you mean a normative change.)
>  As long as the packets look right, you can do a whole lot without
> torquing the standard.

I agree and we did ponder over this approach. However from a previous note
of urs, such failures are non-linear, and using the average RTT's prevents
it from responding appropriately to such non-linear storms. Besides there
are some other issues, I could discuss with you if you think the approach is
worth pursuing.

Thanks,
Vishwas