Re: [OSPF] Poll for WG adoption of draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Fri, 17 October 2014 14:34 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE6D11A01E7 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 07:34:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N0ZX-XkAWYw0 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 07:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7EC91A0047 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 07:34:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2699; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1413556468; x=1414766068; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=6Peu9TLcC1ICiwFw0YEqANNcX6Vi511P0RpVoLK/94s=; b=ZsnlrH1swPWlZz+slMJYUI0BDQ3eMH/ed4WtD1WnYcOLKv0JijNFHAB0 PFrYMXk4SR8jvxRL/eUA2LyAFaQ/zi5BR329mnsdMSOmARmMEpxoxVMbR FO61BAQWU/sVlxB8OkVnJUji5KJ6h2IzYdpxyTvhSe/ui4kq91Wh1Ev/w w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag0FAGkoQVStJV2U/2dsb2JhbABbgkhGgS/UEAKBEBYBfYQDAQEEgQkCAQgEQjIlAgSIUsxGAQEBAQEFAQEBAQEBHJBUhEsFkgCLWYEwg0aRJoN3gjSBAwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,739,1406592000"; d="scan'208,217";a="364144601"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Oct 2014 14:34:28 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com [173.36.12.82]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9HEYRBJ023710 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <ospf@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 14:34:27 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.175]) by xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com ([173.36.12.82]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 09:34:27 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] Poll for WG adoption of draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag
Thread-Index: AQHPwKoSGbQFoOONyUaUf4QhM2C3GA==
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 14:34:26 +0000
Message-ID: <D066A078.573B%acee@cisco.com>
References: <D0212051.2116%acee@cisco.com> <CAB75xn6B=V7CgggHVcynEOS4BPvyYHdcpfkg=y7TPAZ67a6cZQ@mail.gmail.com> <60f1a1748bfc4deabe293f0b5b99633d@BY2PR05MB127.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAB75xn6uo9WKEN=u_R345mpg=YPqM-E7SiEUn27mcFUHzd8kXA@mail.gmail.com> <20140903144543.GC45836@juniper.net> <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B865DC895@szxeml556-mbs.china.huawei.com> <ab163b1c2bb84fd49a20231d45a21026@BY2PR05MB127.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <D02E4FDC.2877%acee@cisco.com> <CAB75xn6FB3ZLMLPUKPpCmUrcgGwJkbUE7ZDPvPmufUy7OQ8dog@mail.gmail.com> <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE082AD6CF@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE082AD6CF@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.21.68.231]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D066A078573Baceeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/b2CmOxm6qNk2_RfVn8Qb60Ma0aI
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Poll for WG adoption of draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 14:34:58 -0000

We believe there is sufficient support for the subject document. Please resubmit the document as draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag-00.txt.

There was significant discussion on the list on when this mechanism should be used and when OSPF capabilities advertisement should be used. That should be clarified but not necessarily in this revision.

Thanks,
Acee