Re: [OSPF] Poll for WG adoption of draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag

[Dhruv Dhody <[e-mail]>]

I agree with Acee, it is cleaner to keep admin tags only for private use,
never to be allocated by IANA.

Dhruv
 On Sep 5, 2014 5:23 AM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Speaking as WG member:
>
>  I agree with using capability bits for whether or not a OSPF router can
> support something and administrative tags for policy. I don¹t think we
> should have well-known tags and am not really even in favor of reserving a
> range just in case we need them.
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
> On 9/4/14, 2:18 PM, "Shraddha Hegde" <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> >My preference would be to use Capability bits/new TLV for well known
> >applications and
> >Using node-tags for config/policy driven generic applications.
> >
> >That said there is no-harm in reserving a range of tags in this document
> >and mentioning it's for "future" use.
> >
> >Rgds
> >shraddha
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: OSPF [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
> >Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 9:11 AM
> >To: Hannes Gredler; Dhruv Dhody
> >Cc: [e-mail]
> >Subject: Re: [OSPF] Poll for WG adoption of
> >draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag
> >
> >Hi Hannes,
> >
> >> |
> >> | > (2) It should be explicitly stated that - No IANA registry is
> >> | > required to
> >> store the meaning or interpretation of.the tag values.
> >> | >
> >> | > <Shraddha> It's mentioned in the section 4.2 that no well known
> >> | > tag
> >> values will be defined by this document.
> >> | >
> >> | Since in the mailing list there is a discussion about possibility of
> >> | having well known tag value assigned by IANA. This document should
> >> | clarify (based on WG consensus) if admin tags can be assigned by
> >> | IANA in future documents or not. And if the answer is yes, a
> >> | suitable range should be set to avoid conflict.
> >>
> >> i have no concerns with that -
> >> however peter seems in favor of using CAP Bits for well-known
> >> applications;
> >>
> >> would be interesting to hear others' opinion on that.
> >
> >FWIW I prefer CAP bits as well and yes! it would interesting to hear from
> >others!
> >
> >Dhruv
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >OSPF mailing list
> >[e-mail]
> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >OSPF mailing list
> >[e-mail]
> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>
>