Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation)

[[e-mail]]

Hi Tom,

As agreed with the authors, we'll proceed with the early allocation
request by leaving the error codes pending upcoming updates (i.e.
request allocation for PCEP TLV and LSP object flags). This will leave
you some time to find an agreement on the final wording of the error
messages.

Thank you for your careful review,

Dhruv & Julien


On 22/03/2021 13:14, tom petch wrote:
> <tp>
> I am unclear how much is being requested of IANA here but ..
>
> s.11.1.1 starts the registry at zero which is consistent with the rest of the I-D.  Is there any need to reserve the value of zero as something special?  Probably not but something to consider
>
> TBD4 and TBD5 have almost identical Error-value which I think unhelpful.  The wording should be more distinctive IMHO.  If this is part of the Early Allocation request, then it is better to fix it now rather than getting into IANA in this form. Perhaps
> 'Unable to amend the..
> 'Unable to allocate a..
> And along with TBD2  and TBD6, as in my separate e-mail, I find 'Binding label/SID' clumsy and would prefer a replacement such as 'Binding value'
>
> Tom Petch