Re: [perpass] "Its an attack" BCP draft

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Its great how we can all focus in on one word:-) I infer
that means you're all ok with all the rest of 'em, but
even better if you said that.

Meanwhile I got an offlist suggestion:

OLD
   In particular, the
   term, when used technically, implies nothing about the motivation of
   the bad-actor mounting the attack, who is still called a bad-actor no
   matter what one really thinks about their motivation.

NEW
   In particular, the
   term, when used technically, implies nothing about the motivation of
   the actor mounting the attack.

Which I think is just fine so I've done that in the working version.

S.

On 11/20/2013 11:19 PM, joel jaeggli wrote:
> On 11/20/13, 3:14 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
>> On Nov 20, 2013, at 6:05 PM, Rob Stradling
>> <rob.stradling@comodo.com> wrote:
>>> s/surveillor/surveillant/  ?
>> 
>> Eavesdropper?   Has negative connotations, but only mildly so.
> 
> bad actor is a value judgement. have no doubt that the intent of 
> surveillance is hostile with respect to the assumputions of the
> privacy of one's communications.
> 
>> _______________________________________________ perpass mailing
>> list perpass@ietf.org 
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ perpass mailing
> list perpass@ietf.org 
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSjUSeAAoJEC88hzaAX42ihT8H/2/McAgInrCQUj+pGfGASH7x
KvouBHynEJI1ajV6TXod91K1cKUOawwi467fznLVKcLIhHtvHYMH+S0R+sC0iCHS
aqBez7DzLoW3MhPp1MIF0M6BSB9x11+y/QnZKFIWftMSP+oUcwEceBNHPGHbXMYU
ZRRNIos3Tg/9CmPDSYa+lRTxcnEsJoRli/Nxv7mLLPhcH9zzuUX/hIor4F0gc+8D
Qre2kLepo9WyvaOmPkmuLK9kZXzwB5ROrkAlnRRx2beX9y17nrh+YG2ogrCZ6a3Y
irhHLuzkMVzf6sRWMHgUMFAz4kEgQBwL/Pcw+6OexqG3sCDcuQp3o79zINymTJQ=
=9M9H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----