IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [perpass] "Its an attack" BCP draft

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Wed, 27 November 2013 21:10 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B98071AE14B for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 13:10:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s_YfJ2L55vkO for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 13:10:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C76F41ADF27 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 13:10:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30BD52CC6B; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 23:10:23 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vhsjpqgmh4jZ; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 23:10:22 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B26792CC48; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 23:10:22 +0200 (EET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <528D34D7.1010303@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 23:10:22 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BD5ADC0E-216A-44A9-BD1B-829CA0EBAFBD@piuha.net>
References: <528D34D7.1010303@cs.tcd.ie>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: perpass <perpass@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [perpass] "Its an attack" BCP draft
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 21:10:28 -0000

> then we'll ask Jari to start a
> 4-week IETF LC for it. When he thinks that's ok he'll start it
> and then we'll see how that goes.

I just wanted to send out a message saying that I'm watching this. 

Stephen's message had a lot of explanation of what the IAB and IESG think about it. I do think, however, the key is what the IETF thinks. Obviously. So lets keep those comments coming, so that Stephen/Hannes and I can do an initial assessment of what if anything needs to change in the -00 for me to start an IETF Last Call.

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email