Re: [perpass] "Its an attack" BCP draft

Robin Wilton <wilton@isoc.org> Fri, 22 November 2013 16:55 UTC

Return-Path: <wilton@isoc.org>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD291AE3E8 for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 08:55:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TMDgf-outfsj for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 08:55:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp126.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (smtp126.iad3a.emailsrvr.com [173.203.187.126]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F181AE047 for <perpass@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 08:55:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp8.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id BB19B2480A2; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 11:55:47 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: OK
Received: by smtp8.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: wilton-AT-isoc.org) with ESMTPSA id 3A85B2480FA; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 11:55:47 -0500 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_12CE43EA-2792-4FBC-AAF8-E04B14B67ABD"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
From: Robin Wilton <wilton@isoc.org>
In-Reply-To: <528F70AC.8020306@bbn.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 16:55:39 +0000
Message-Id: <2CE72160-0814-457C-A8DD-F01A826D29FB@isoc.org>
References: <528D34D7.1010303@cs.tcd.ie> <528D3A85.5090003@gmail.com> <528D3B28.8020406@cs.tcd.ie> <686FEA45-2F2B-40E8-9063-7180C047483A@icloud.com> <D110B195-75FC-4DFC-8EF4-36DF78BB039B@isoc.org> <528F70AC.8020306@bbn.com>
To: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
Cc: perpass@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [perpass] "Its an attack" BCP draft
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 16:55:57 -0000

Fair points. 

There is something about the recent revelations that makes this idea seem important - of entities who have one nominal role in the 'ecosystem' but abuse that role to conceal harmful activity... but OK, we can reflect that in other ways than by the use of the term "bad actor".

Have a good weekend, everyone - 

Robin

Robin Wilton
Technical Outreach Director - Identity and Privacy
Internet Society

email: wilton@isoc.org
Phone: +44 705 005 2931
Twitter: @futureidentity




On 22 Nov 2013, at 14:56, Stephen Kent wrote:

> Robin,
> 
> Jon is correct in term of the usual terminology employed in the security community.
> 
> Also, because we have said that we are trying to address passive wiretapping
> effected by a wide range of adversaries, I don't think we're focusing exclusively
> on entities who are "legitimate" participants.
> 
> Steve
> 
> On 11/21/13 6:27 PM, Robin Wilton wrote:
>> I'm not sure I agree... in this context, "bad actors" are those who exploit their legitimate participation in a system to act in illegitimate ways, advancing their interests regardless of the disbenefit to others or to the system itself.
>> 
>> That's not necessarily adversarial...
>> 
>> R
> _______________________________________________
> perpass mailing list
> perpass@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass