IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [perpass] Violating end-to-end principle: I-D Action: draft-farrelll-mpls-opportunistic-encrypt-00.txt

Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org> Thu, 16 January 2014 16:39 UTC

Return-Path: <joe@cdt.org>
X-Original-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: perpass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F35B61AE3A4 for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 08:39:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lgs4e5fmvHEX for <perpass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 08:39:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.maclaboratory.net (mail.maclaboratory.net [209.190.215.232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 466AA1AE39A for <perpass@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 08:39:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Footer: Y2R0Lm9yZw==
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.maclaboratory.net (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256 bits)) for perpass@ietf.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:38:51 -0500
Message-ID: <52D80B1A.8060100@cdt.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:38:50 -0500
From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: perpass@ietf.org
References: <04c001cf1123$7e5c00c0$7b140240$@olddog.co.uk> <CAMm+Lwj0r3PNoBC0Y1ydibD3piioZ57Z1Ks-Ea6o58xahjXKwQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+Lwj0r3PNoBC0Y1ydibD3piioZ57Z1Ks-Ea6o58xahjXKwQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [perpass] Violating end-to-end principle: I-D Action: draft-farrelll-mpls-opportunistic-encrypt-00.txt
X-BeenThere: perpass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The perpass list is for IETF discussion of pervasive monitoring. " <perpass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass/>
List-Post: <mailto:perpass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass>, <mailto:perpass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 16:39:07 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256


On 1/16/14, 9:57 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> Rather than contrast S/MIME and PGP being 'end-to-end' protocols
> against STARTTLS being transport, it is rather more useful to
> recognize that S/MIME and PGP are data level security rather than
> transport layer.

I like how the recent Barnes et al. draft refers to this as "object
encryption." best, joe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=yDWx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email