Re: [perpass] tcpcrypt applicability (Was: Re: Violating end-to-end principle: I-D Action: draft-farrelll-mpls-opportunistic-encrypt-00.txt)

[Stephen Kent <[e-mail]>]

PHB,

I'd respond to your comments if they were directly tied to specific 
statements
I made. But, for the most part, they are so vague ...

WRT Omnibroker, my comment was not based on key agreement being part of 
Omnibroker;
it was an observation that your recent proposals all tend to focus on 
technologies that
fit nicely into a model where you current employer could generate a 
revenue stream,
as an extension of its current Web PKI CA model. I have not tracked the 
evolution
of Omnibroker, as it is an individual submission. Since such submissions are
not vetted, it's not generally worth my time to track them.

Steve