Re: [pim] call for adoption: draft-zhou-pim-vrrp-01
"Prashant Jhingran (pjhingra)" <pjhingra@cisco.com> Thu, 23 May 2013 09:08 UTC
Return-Path: <pjhingra@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EC7E21F9702 for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2013 02:08:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.057
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.057 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sOL47FBVUVlB for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2013 02:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A72B621F964C for <pim@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2013 02:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5604; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1369300113; x=1370509713; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=Ocaq2b4Bl3xiGIKcoqjCEpvxi/DaZHsFJi5YK9ooXOM=; b=Ulnv7tm0RVamPg0lCFNJbHFduDfz0KG2IxxlIIjzFRkPlLjRXFIgi0XX 8XFcx7Zjh9tFxo7GJTxl4a234XeUxAoYt0qDa4oKG2LGIp2CVxnvDbdpI ice3M2AXr/H0OX9ose0rO9YKWLSI5Qeha0bThWvxr67/NL0kUf2S0U80g M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Au0FAJnbnVGtJXG+/2dsb2JhbABagwgwgzu+cA19FnSCIwEBAQQBAQEaFzoLDAQCAQYCEQQBAQEEBh0FAgIfBgsUCQgCBAENBQgBh3IDDwyNQZseCIhpDYh0gSKLJIImDwcbBwaCNzZhA5VSgw+KdIUjgw+CJg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,726,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="213813431"
Received: from rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com ([173.37.113.190]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 May 2013 09:08:33 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com [173.36.12.89]) by rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4N98WHx029503 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 23 May 2013 09:08:32 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.194]) by xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com ([173.36.12.89]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 23 May 2013 04:08:32 -0500
From: "Prashant Jhingran (pjhingra)" <pjhingra@cisco.com>
To: "Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva@cisco.com>, Mike McBride <mmcbride7@gmail.com>, Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>, "sganesan@extremenetworks.com" <sganesan@extremenetworks.com>, "Wei Zhou (weizho2)" <weizho2@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [pim] call for adoption: draft-zhou-pim-vrrp-01
Thread-Index: AQHOVrP+ivzvTZvrmky2qTiDZ//NRpkRujuggADBIUA=
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 09:08:31 +0000
Message-ID: <F567B77E0728694BB6716DB3C9000B6B12ABC487@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com>
References: <CAL3FGfwaXhsfRoJXo17LipzGNvUH0jL2sQdcrmMqzBa0ZB16og@mail.gmail.com> <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE07F669D4@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com> <CAL3FGfy2WdAmtnUO97nx0TYMeMqStkUmJfa42VDu=6MOykbzwQ@mail.gmail.com> <B14A62A57AB87D45BB6DD7D9D2B78F0B116B0DB0@xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <B14A62A57AB87D45BB6DD7D9D2B78F0B116B0DB0@xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.142.105.208]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "pim@ietf.org" <pim@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [pim] call for adoption: draft-zhou-pim-vrrp-01
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pim>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 09:08:39 -0000
Hi Mike, I agree with Rajiv, both drafts are trying to solve the same issue....that too in almost similar way. - Regards, Prashant Jhingran NOSTG TME - SP Wi-Fi http://wwwin.cisco.com/ios/tech/mobile/proxyipv6/ http://wwwin.cisco.com/ios/tech/broadband -----Original Message----- From: Rajiv Asati (rajiva) Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 3:06 AM To: Mike McBride; Xuxiaohu; sganesan@extremenetworks.com; Prashant Jhingran (pjhingra); Wei Zhou (weizho2) Cc: Stig Venaas; pim@ietf.org Subject: RE: [pim] call for adoption: draft-zhou-pim-vrrp-01 Hi Mike, It seems that both drafts seem to solve nearly the same problem (multiple routers on the multi-access interface and existence of first-hop redundancy protocols e.g. VRRP). Cheers, Rajiv > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike McBride [mailto:mmcbride7@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 2:17 AM > To: Xuxiaohu; sganesan@extremenetworks.com; Rajiv Asati (rajiva); > Prashant Jhingran (pjhingra); Wei Zhou (weizho2) > Cc: Stig Venaas; Mike McBride; pim@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [pim] call for adoption: draft-zhou-pim-vrrp-01 > > Folks, > > We have this new draft-zhou-pim-vrrp-01 which we are about to adopt > into the pim wg. It has been brought to the WGs attention that there > is a older draft (draft-xu-pim-drpriority-auto-adjustment-03) which > may have some overlap with the new one. That older draft does contain > information about VRRP aware PIM which is attributed to Stig in the > acknowledgements. If the five of you authors feel that there is some > validity that the older draft contains some information being used in > the new draft, you may want to acknowledge that in the references or > acknowledgements. It appears the drafts are dissimilar enough to not > be merged but I may be wrong. Please share your opinions on this so we > can establish consensus within the group and move the document along. > > If the broader WG participants have an opinion on this please speak up. > > thanks, > mike > > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > This draft reminds me that there has been a draft > (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-pim-drpriority-auto-adjustment-03 > ) three years before which uses almost the same technology to save > almost the same problem. > > > > The following is quoted from the above draft: > > > > "In fact, if VRRP is run on the PIM routers and the VRRP has enabled > > the upstream link tracking mechanism, the PIM DR failover mechanism > > could be coupled with the VRRP so as to reuse the upstream link > > tracking mechanism of VRRP. One option is to synchronize the PIM DR > > priority value to the VRRP priority value always. In this way, the > > PIM DR and the VRRP master will always run on an identical router if > > the VRRP Preempt_Mode is set to True. Another option is to make the > > PIM DR and the VRRP master run on an identical router anyway (i.e., > > regardless whether or not the VRRP Preempt_Mode is True). To achieve > > this goal, the PIM DR priority of the VRRP master router SHOULD > > always be set to a higher fixed value than that of the VRRP slave > > router automatically." > > > > Best regards, > > Xiaohu > > > >> -----邮件原件----- > >> 发件人: pim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pim-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 > Mike > >> McBride > >> 发送时间: 2013年5月10日 3:48 > >> 收件人: pim@ietf.org > >> 主题: [pim] call for adoption: draft-zhou-pim-vrrp-01 > >> > >> draft-zhou-pim-vrrp-01 was presented in our most recent pim meeting > >> in Orlando. 4 people were in favor of adopting the draft. Zero against. > >> Please read the draft (its short) and provide an opinion either way > >> by the end of next Friday the 17th. > >> > >> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-zhou-pim-vrrp-01.txt > >> > >> thanks, > >> mike > >> _______________________________________________ > >> pim mailing list > >> pim@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim
- [pim] call for adoption: draft-zhou-pim-vrrp-01 Mike McBride
- Re: [pim] call for adoption: draft-zhou-pim-vrrp-… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [pim] call for adoption: draft-zhou-pim-vrrp-… Heidi Ou (hou)
- Re: [pim] call for adoption: draft-zhou-pim-vrrp-… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [pim] call for adoption: draft-zhou-pim-vrrp-… Mike McBride
- Re: [pim] call for adoption: draft-zhou-pim-vrrp-… Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
- Re: [pim] call for adoption: draft-zhou-pim-vrrp-… Prashant Jhingran (pjhingra)
- Re: [pim] call for adoption: draft-zhou-pim-vrrp-… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [pim] call for adoption: draft-zhou-pim-vrrp-… Wei Zhou (weizho2)
- Re: [pim] call for adoption: draft-zhou-pim-vrrp-… Wei Zhou (weizho2)
- Re: [pim] call for adoption: draft-zhou-pim-vrrp-… Mike McBride
- Re: [pim] call for adoption: draft-zhou-pim-vrrp-… Wei Zhou (weizho2)
- [pim] 答复: call for adoption: draft-zhou-pim-vrrp-… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [pim] 答复: call for adoption: draft-zhou-pim-v… Stig Venaas
- [pim] 答复: 答复: call for adoption: draft-zhou-pim-v… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [pim] call for adoption: draft-zhou-pim-vrrp-… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [pim] call for adoption: draft-zhou-pim-vrrp-… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [pim] 答复: call for adoption: draft-zhou-pim-v… Stig Venaas
- Re: [pim] call for adoption: draft-zhou-pim-vrrp-… Wei Zhou (weizho2)
- Re: [pim] call for adoption: draft-zhou-pim-vrrp-… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [pim] call for adoption: draft-zhou-pim-vrrp-… Wei Zhou (weizho2)