Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Prevent an unlikely deadlock (#1965)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Mon, 05 November 2018 08:31 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD026129AB8 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 00:31:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id taxnWoScCpjA for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 00:31:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-6.smtp.github.com (out-6.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBE0A1274D0 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 00:31:24 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 00:31:24 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1541406684; bh=qwqlvt/hIXf6Jco8tNGRUXYHd6m8dcWFwwoaLDbo68Q=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=YoVcJX3dLFLYhiX6FZSVQEwfjftY/TC/jRxx+MyLTg/u0xKd2+hBQjTFqLQDeHja2 Cfk8oJVlWfrVdMwHoWUlskKdA2qa0PeFeItbE7GBIdplaWpF3SX3iD0aapU7Ty1Q+v 0wLfY/j+O89k9UoLz2l2ecQqhgGQG/C6rkUAG9g4=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab54a0f7dbdbbe47d957cd2755808d757d74b91d1892cf0000000117f7c1db92a169ce167cded5@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1965/review/171449939@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1965@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1965@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Prevent an unlikely deadlock (#1965)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5bdfffdc1e47_7b803ffcb0ad45c0104178"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/3S1X1yM6yQtwQlViOrtbwhINM-k>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 08:31:27 -0000

ianswett commented on this pull request.



> @@ -418,6 +418,12 @@ used to send a probe into the network prior to establishing any packet loss,
 prior unacknowledged packets SHOULD NOT be marked as lost when a TLP timer
 expires.
 
+If no new data or unacknowledged data is available to send, a retransmittable
+frame SHOULD be sent.  Sending a retransmittable frame ensures that any in
+flight packets are acknowledged or declared lost in a timely manner.

howso?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1965#discussion_r230664195