IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF hosting vs. Github

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Tue, 08 June 2021 09:32 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 322563A29C6 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 02:32:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OYnArqGUlfSh for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 02:32:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF6D03A299E for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 02:32:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [212.68.24.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C7E5260031C; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 12:31:55 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1623144715; bh=vaulASo0hUTCUn3Mr/FvtHNavbrUu0oxtiPuNHmkIGk=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=fjN3esoavuRhDo6dlr7y57vDQibE+5/VoH0b0+pSVMOJRq/w+KGrA6w8nunNkt1Wo w54GbG565YzrABTVz5WspYx23kiwPvKYLuwv9qVsJdI/2Wi9LW0KSq1M1qF35ku1E4 r1LLxRprEOq39nz1TkGdAYc1XyU/GXJKgYcOM68s=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <7BD7272F-B837-4275-A129-DE5BBC74BB2E@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_08DC6318-DFBC-4BB5-AC46-E8D2864BDEEE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.22\))
Subject: Re: IETF hosting vs. Github
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 12:31:54 +0300
In-Reply-To: <20210608084039.GB21317@1wt.eu>
Cc: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
References: <20210607123854.GA16312@nic.fr> <CAC7UV9bkqOeCgDsCH+Hdq0v=zmRKNNDtpfiq6Ap_vzm5zUzGVg@mail.gmail.com> <CALGR9oZiUe5TyY3Tv432__GH=v+Lpv2EZah0G4ZD+g3E2FkaMg@mail.gmail.com> <20210607130422.GA27971@sources.org> <EE723B6D-7B6B-4B68-A4A1-F1809CF68F1B@gmail.com> <20210607142015.GA31240@sources.org> <C1B56269-0EF7-42EC-8824-70F7485807B2@gmail.com> <20210607190027.GC5394@sources.org> <7CE3F7FC-21C1-4519-AA60-A2FDFFC512EE@gbiv.com> <20210608074216.GA23743@sources.org> <20210608084039.GB21317@1wt.eu>
X-MailScanner-ID: C7E5260031C.A00FB
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/pouoIA689nM5siQxKeaKztw19Qg>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 09:32:08 -0000

Hi,

On 2021-6-8, at 11:40, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:
> One concern could be that all discussions in issues would need to be
> archived though (I don't know if they are nor how to do that).

we archive issue discussions by having them forwarded to this mailing list: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues

> Because
> my personal feeling is that while relying more on issues has significantly
> improved the focus and reduced bikeshedding, it has also significantly
> reduced exposure to certain points, and we don't have the archives of
> these discussions anymore in our respective mailboxes.

You can subscribe to the list above, and then you do have things in your own mailbox, or you can search the issues list at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/. (You can of course also search the issues directly on GitHub.)

Thanks,
Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email