Re: [regext] rfc7484bis

Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> Tue, 11 August 2020 18:33 UTC

Return-Path: <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016713A0AC8 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 11:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.889
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.889 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=viagenie-ca.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mi4OHy2PUhGk for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 11:33:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72f.google.com (mail-qk1-x72f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9F583A09AC for <regext@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 11:33:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72f.google.com with SMTP id 2so12555643qkf.10 for <regext@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 11:33:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=viagenie-ca.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version; bh=WsVYQGnI/mlCD6S+DrIhWXEwGbNdBATP/fvgdZfXddw=; b=V9mx+qf748r+4CS6svfPnUso/rNn9n12URrLsCr6vkQYXbUj6AsWHyrarsackxTcyi ASkUAi5IWwZa/r9eyEbUrCRHbwrYqrUMZvwE38Rj9+lAmg/h6WwoRciQg8HhZFungNa0 r/g1+RRMOmFF0V9Hgn/h/TOPmugCe0zCtNxxhDWDeakNdwHHmoGKS1eqIxuNDD9siPr3 KaA0VVf8nzkNU2R5uAq77VKClPCXxTHslnymmuiOaIT9K2u5GRIHRYZMKzpHa/N1gtOb R7MJ9Q3uWM6m9ehBBIVrrapUxKrvVNBJwZqECrXUsV29GSYhJPXTtqcJ+qL9pksr+ZpM lOYQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version; bh=WsVYQGnI/mlCD6S+DrIhWXEwGbNdBATP/fvgdZfXddw=; b=KTqEJbyEhPkiZx5X1Eb6bwbPeNr+Y2ip7d3kjOSP6lzfNDE3MVDYEkWC+E2Ify2Vw8 Pjr1ybZUuDD82RXodbEUsvswMqZ/PUo8/wQCy7afsnye6FE1V1ozDINPsYjqee0lkdPU t4Urwh+sFaJTiAT6fzERhQYB/gTA3bxHOQUrqA2VZyj1ucEP7HVhPwhNNTa533io28zl Sy4OqNhQQ3i7NTEJ7h4ycmmauTvXwDT7iRtlRFY+CkcgxCSaDWZyNNzWgz410SloV0bD WXxJX+oMlXN0i6hB64XiqY05f7//CRPEWb5kqDnT37L+npdSHNXort2LfX7qt6WeyqLi 6C8w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531QnepBtXMAxxrZ5g/FLpLfRdxz+f7B/N/NWd8W9AKiLLeYz0Y0 A2KAAD4KIpqKsXiP1XbWsDPKxA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyeq0bKFKqiGx5Asg8cn6p9cal7RTmdIpZy8MHM6QnKfA1VY4W+3WE+VJMD8K1P1Fn1Qj1kiQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:6650:: with SMTP id a77mr2576406qkc.265.1597170820547; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 11:33:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.60] (modemcable138.218-70-69.static.videotron.ca. [69.70.218.138]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h55sm21869262qte.16.2020.08.11.11.33.39 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Aug 2020 11:33:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Marc Blanchet" <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
To: "Gavin Brown" <gavin.brown@centralnic.com>
Cc: regext@ietf.org, "Patrick Mevzek" <pm@dotandco.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 14:33:38 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.1r5671)
Message-ID: <EB25569C-75A6-4097-A7A1-0D6C55F7B95E@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <00ae8cca-fc44-4279-b6f7-3f57d86474b1@www.fastmail.com>
References: <801B9484-0F94-4CB4-ABBC-AAC495361E80@centralnic.com> <00ae8cca-fc44-4279-b6f7-3f57d86474b1@www.fastmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/-q1bPw1iSXzIoFk-WN3cpZgKOEA>
Subject: Re: [regext] rfc7484bis
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 18:33:45 -0000

On 4 Aug 2020, at 15:47, Patrick Mevzek wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020, at 14:32, Gavin Brown wrote:
>> 1. client implementers should be advised to prefer https:// base URLs
>> over http:// base URLs.
>
> I think this is already addressed by this text in the current RFC:
> "
>    Per [RFC7258], in each array of base RDAP URLs, the secure versions
>    of the transport protocol SHOULD be preferred and tried first.  For
>    example, if the base RDAP URLs array contains both HTTPS and HTTP
>    URLs, the bootstrap client SHOULD try the HTTPS version first.
> "

Gavin,
 Patrick is right. text was already there. ;-) Happy with the current text?

Marc.