Re: [regext] rfc7484bis

Gavin Brown <gavin.brown@centralnic.com> Tue, 04 August 2020 19:32 UTC

Return-Path: <gavin.brown@centralnic.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1333A11A0 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 12:32:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=centralnic-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qxLk6olZ0o_0 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 12:32:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x433.google.com (mail-wr1-x433.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::433]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 068733A1160 for <regext@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 12:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x433.google.com with SMTP id a5so28515360wrm.6 for <regext@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 12:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=centralnic-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:message-id:date :cc:to; bh=FJWzxEYNCq5KSEsSEYjyH9xFgsFsG7M7BDkvH8sdM4Q=; b=bTwlL4ZTlMMHFBvGS49tdv/WhjaHuln/f+xmvmlX1747Qv8tipSQk4R0IaVxjdHimB xekDSwGqwAmi9cOECqo2bzuhd5erPuDIkvMgifKdIC+cJ9mGweIcNg2nNstCOR2Tp4qw x9dXtj5aB6sjiFHLUBynxxv7QLWCE8sAAM8yEVzw4m17b0s/GoUhj0e2Ap/a72ty7ziL 8wlujP2ONaBS+RSd1lI9YpN4mrvGXBZ+V5+bujA/Xi5ya5pZ0cvXa4Vzb1q4kVCBy7WF Ifv22l178yCxpVsp5NdV/fKEW2JbWzZ+0twZVQ6oPmQ27px7UPYdw3JGV9VhBn2/0Noy kkfA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:message-id:date:cc:to; bh=FJWzxEYNCq5KSEsSEYjyH9xFgsFsG7M7BDkvH8sdM4Q=; b=dh0jAnS2p8F5xN2UBUubenZKda/J6hUFs41k2jYxh1VEwjOz8yy/Aro3umucUQLOm0 t4ofPaC3ZMvwOg1UqpFCHLbr6L5vmQ/Bvq7NIc6wATejbOiM2BR3MFTzxlV+OZPeErr6 5LjhxnFIRLQ1zCKxmhlbPFCQfnyws9EfnQRCt+zBi81puQ+ubv/xGItt+UqiXsCFgm3D 4c6ddqpYsSPmoPImcaRrSgEOV+DsPV4rMNCT/0dsjFih9Kc51ohQ4ua+UEg4Whh/O9eO T5I6eeUst8IQsZPvKRg1ah5mp4NSxJrRVDCvRjTvUoP0/92joqt1KfxWycsYlAzXBsFo VFCA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533F3mTHgOqfPzm4xyc2fQ0BdVPseQWiJoJ+QIzDL7K4IXsRBf6K wEQRBGyQ8c+HYfpNtP0jhSoAdIgnkBW7CA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzb5BT2t5yvwm6r8zB4LxhMsdnEla3sd2e95T9XTbBQyNPzb1v3WrcCzPOQ9aGpNlvSxX5w0w==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:b34a:: with SMTP id k10mr20377747wrd.402.1596569567960; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 12:32:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from broadband.bt.com ([2a00:23c3:d706:2b01:7c48:7198:ea3b:b39f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m1sm5268204wmc.28.2020.08.04.12.32.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Aug 2020 12:32:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: Gavin Brown <gavin.brown@centralnic.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Message-Id: <801B9484-0F94-4CB4-ABBC-AAC495361E80@centralnic.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 20:32:47 +0100
Cc: regext@ietf.org
To: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/hO-qc7FVyBzPcYeqNCzG-bMaG0E>
Subject: Re: [regext] rfc7484bis
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 19:32:55 -0000

Hi Marc,

> as Scott is updating RFC7482,RFC7483 for standard level, I’m doing the same for rfc7484. I haven’t heard major issues or major fixes to be made for rfc7484. I have a few wording fixes only at this time. There were some discussions on enhancing RFC7484 for other use cases, but never went far.
> if anyone has a something to raise for RFC7484, please send me email asap.

RFC 7484 doesn't provide any guidance for client implementers about how to select a base RDAP URL when the services array contains more than one entry. As a result I suspect that in this scenario different implementations will behave in different ways, and users are at risk of seeing different responses depending on the client they use.

My suggestions are that:-

1. client implementers should be advised to prefer https:// base URLs over http:// base URLs.

2. server operators should be advised that if multiple base URLs with the same scheme are present in an entry, then all the RDAP endpoints referenced by these base URLs must return identical responses (for the same RDAP query).

Thanks,

G.

--
Gavin Brown
Head of Registry Services and Chief Innovation Officer
CentralNic Group plc (LSE:CNIC)
https://www.centralnic.com

Tel: +44.7548243029

CentralNic Group plc is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 8576358. Registered Offices: Saddlers House, Gutter Lane, London EC2V 6AE.