IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [regext] rfc7484bis

George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> Sun, 16 August 2020 23:27 UTC

Return-Path: <ggm@algebras.org>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6153A127D for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 16:27:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=algebras-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O19Cz15SKUBo for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 16:27:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd32.google.com (mail-io1-xd32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D8E03A1259 for <regext@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 16:27:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd32.google.com with SMTP id s189so15951282iod.2 for <regext@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 16:27:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=algebras-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Z1qqrgIVZe6rZDrZrcZHGt8J88+G1kxGQ1mU3zOupWw=; b=J7mDc0GhQ5jU4JvV5k1ncYjkHRLi1cbwKmsiXXKnRb31/18TWJ7ymonJqBPImijIV3 BNxP1+M/gImH13hVnnKpoYMsEPg+oZnsVdqYrpZhGFvJWfoLef5/WABeCQGJohs/P0sq gEMnnUpyFXYG0WAoW1yc+x3Tm4K3+ajE1Dg0b6ofI5WLCjID70VwlHeCwVGKhfz/hetP 1p0ytwqImiGjeJjNtPdz0g/Xq/WnsEaNqWzdDzHyiHK5fci5Rd+F6o2PzXQeOknpNN/V aamuu3d4Sfwbz3zUf3iU2SI+Zm12HpOQ0KIbEKVmxW0Q07Ww34QP/e3fXcyzXWYZqJ23 DQEQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Z1qqrgIVZe6rZDrZrcZHGt8J88+G1kxGQ1mU3zOupWw=; b=q9ACynjfir8xYbBsckHdQxH/JbfYqZ9bYQ7rJ0Y5XBgVjBxUxLLQrNJcTQInlJp6JE 74uP7fQpxI3+kGyNjXWC+2K5hIwY7Rk8vNtKFUf4uyIhoqXsdA8BHxXndikowlga+eA/ nLqDlew3Tv3p6DintouSCceb2cB6ng4X94DxvEN2okFHxXmUOEpwR8ZXD5BnHZm2CFaU vimkmtfxpBPhWel/rt17XA2uhZH5ne8zAeqQ+UPz1M7XgYr+jaRRgU2h6xjWpJrabi6W W78EaEjunYgPmTaSocWMnsLaB1RQSWkkleStY0uMoIp7O8Vx67jCLl209NkpfNFm1Oim 3nzA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532zJdL9KSl+Oe9MUVpRPR06t5bbJzN/B0/1O5noFcSNaXFJ/CYq nnkw90uppnHPNZhD9kR7zIdaVMnD4p7mS/dTcMQ7iqb4899biQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzpLMndBBXfXpMoZ3xRpzVLX9XcQLG1wKiijja4Pc08/uRdqjY10t4P7scAbcoBYK5LxcWXOq6qhrHqnjloK64=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:aa87:: with SMTP id u7mr12033964jai.13.1597620458615; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 16:27:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <801B9484-0F94-4CB4-ABBC-AAC495361E80@centralnic.com> <00ae8cca-fc44-4279-b6f7-3f57d86474b1@www.fastmail.com> <EB25569C-75A6-4097-A7A1-0D6C55F7B95E@viagenie.ca> <8A4AA778-7BFC-40B3-B245-B4ADB87A4A7B@centralnic.com> <09097926-F82D-44D5-9727-219AC6141CA9@viagenie.ca> <0324097F-AF2D-4EAD-A089-CDAC984BFC80@centralnic.com>
In-Reply-To: <0324097F-AF2D-4EAD-A089-CDAC984BFC80@centralnic.com>
From: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 09:27:27 +1000
Message-ID: <CAKr6gn37fQxnGnDzMauwe3YefhvUoYAwktk9oCRATsPFMQc=sA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/p7GFD77NXdm2OSburgG5dcQaXwk>
Subject: Re: [regext] rfc7484bis
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2020 23:27:49 -0000

I would like to see some allowance of limited metadata about which
node responded, or other information variance. If thats confined to
comments in the outer protocol, it means the response inline cannot be
used to debug specific problems with the node which responded.

We see this all the time in DNS: The lack of information about the
service methods used to supply a response makes debug significantly
harder.

in-band introspection is useful. It isn't about the response, its
about how the response came to be.

-G

On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 9:40 PM Gavin Brown <gavin.brown@centralnic.com> wrote:
>
> > On 12 Aug 2020, at 17:18, Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> wrote:
> >
> > well, already added text in the published draft yesterday.
> >
> > https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-blanchet-regext-rfc7484bis-00.txt
> >
> > extract of my added text:
> > « All RDAP endpoints referenced by the URLs in the array MUST return
> >   identical responses for the same RDAP query. »
> >
> > would that work?
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> G.
>
> --
> Gavin Brown
> Head of Registry Services and Chief Innovation Officer
> CentralNic Group plc (LSE:CNIC)
> https://www.centralnic.com
>
> Tel: +44.7548243029
>
> CentralNic Group plc is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 8576358. Registered Offices: Saddlers House, Gutter Lane, London EC2V 6AE.
>
> _______________________________________________
> regext mailing list
> regext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email