IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [regext] draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay unreasonably stuck on IPR?

Ulrich Wisser <ulrich@wisser.se> Mon, 28 November 2016 20:16 UTC

Return-Path: <ulrich@wisser.se>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 490E112951B for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:16:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=wisser-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oK_hex-uyReN for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:16:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22c.google.com (mail-wm0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C450E129461 for <regext@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:16:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id a197so216995320wmd.0 for <regext@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:16:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wisser-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CF/PTp/XnP5l+QbGxOTlsUHx/fE+c6tBOlpiJ/XbpIo=; b=qCrpxWdbLnXbEYCPzQxV0jVKjLu9Vl9/M8TwkGdUkNCTf8Jlr5mUaKQx/2xm7VxjAW PEYZWJzgei7r8aaZhagcVUO9tuNTO1uqk3FFq6D0FFf9utAT7fqOjlBqAxVOQ0CEyHMQ ivCL5WRwKapmEL8NPfTUlOqQ11qbOSN4GFMalZgqeDGUXDazCHCwQ9oX9utl++yDYPEO DIYSLX7nzoIkpjKSRtwIuhhaGjKOqDMvJ9iIcE+La6sx7r5/xDQgIXYcuCnUAeWk7ooZ 4nJs68q2+PVD1Tonv/Ji8gVxIa3vX4XwHtFLk86B7m+aWM/8muookvD9WStswIQGu4S0 Vv2g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CF/PTp/XnP5l+QbGxOTlsUHx/fE+c6tBOlpiJ/XbpIo=; b=izZWDZ+FZr+YHQE73qK4QpC9TIVEe5wOPzZau2IyGKXIPYi+tdtjcLacEloQVnL6bI g3qg2spcRxLZ8zPNY+W02piqtnc7N/JFHf9jSIwHchFi9p1ZjSznUjeOGxYcv9khVgJQ p8Jgor4NZBpGspFZsRuhZ3+d2HzpZSWR3Pw2KGDH3OxTDodz4955GuZgxdP8YNKjIiXK 1nWqKRDVCqMiR9wIj14/EgUTe5c5Ah6afCCGy9sP8D0p+LXxCCyZm1d5Q6HfEitn09M4 0It5I9xqYx/iclPZ/uvbhNjxiHjxQ84jxrZR2sN9FmLoW8pFAwEsNsqfQpfX4OXT3NBF b//Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02uU39Loe7H/B2KETamucrFYxnEkXBhTjC+bHNvv46FH8KA4GzZDpMB91JVqO9g9Qeygj/RAzHegLwq0A==
X-Received: by 10.28.133.144 with SMTP id h138mr22387884wmd.12.1480364205978; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:16:45 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20161108144742.GH2473@Hanna.local> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A4BC33E@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <20161109093524.GC89276@Vurt.local> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A4BCC19@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <20161109134114.GK2473@Hanna.local> <C851A2CF-B946-4E3E-8799-585851CDEB77@antoin.nl> <20161110103304.GL89276@Vurt.local> <20161110103746.nhgp5mgz6ndczrlt@miek.nl> <201611281521.uASFLhci025980@bela.nlnetlabs.nl>
In-Reply-To: <201611281521.uASFLhci025980@bela.nlnetlabs.nl>
From: Ulrich Wisser <ulrich@wisser.se>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 20:16:35 +0000
Message-ID: <CAJ9-zoWtHBwBbe=vRoDkHnkKLOTiz4_xjGCUPYTMvPq_OmgPwA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@nlnetlabs.nl>, Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11443c74a2d3e7054262267f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/8tRnwTREn6Ay_njeRJG_VYfIr4M>
Cc: "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [regext] draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay unreasonably stuck on IPR?
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 20:16:54 -0000

I believe the majority in the room in Seoul preferred to go forward.
(I certainly indicated my support of moving forward.)
Our area director seemed to have the same impression.
So if there isn't an outcry on the list, that's what we're doing, right?

/Ulrich

Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@nlnetlabs.nl> schrieb am Mo., 28. Nov. 2016 um
16:21 Uhr:

>  Miek Gieben writes:
>
>  >
>  >
>  > [ Quoting <job@instituut.net> in "Re: [regext]
> draft-ietf-eppext-keyr..." ]
>  > >Dear Working Group,
>  > >
>  > >TL;DR: the working group should move forward and disregard Verisign's
> IPR claim.
>  >
>  > +1 from me on this.
>  >
>
> Given all the argments I've seen on this list, going ahead seems to be
> the only way out of this stalemate.
>
>         jaap
>
> _______________________________________________
> regext mailing list
> regext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
>
-- 
Ulrich Wisser
ulrich@wisser.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email