IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [regext] draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay unreasonably stuck on IPR?

Rik Ribbers <rik.ribbers@sidn.nl> Thu, 10 November 2016 10:38 UTC

Return-Path: <rik.ribbers@sidn.nl>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2477512965F for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 02:38:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.797
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.797 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sidn.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JBqVT7K-uSCY for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 02:38:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from arn2-kamx.sidn.nl (kamx.sidn.nl [IPv6:2a00:d78:0:147:94:198:152:69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 778381293D8 for <regext@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 02:38:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; d=sidn.nl; s=sidn-nl; c=relaxed/relaxed; h=from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:x-mailer:x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype:x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader:x-originating-ip:content-type:mime-version; bh=9NCRKNpJGG3nw/AIZl82AEesDCWdxEmjs2URyNzxQ8c=; b=j1J2u2o8WsD7jCSkZoQdCtgS/n5dEwh/Zr/wOsUjI8PcRLFl33K5sUA77ZwgOYtkxGHmHpSAwLm+Jzc34G8tHA0VFprRvLe+Gn01TiVYGMn1P8NbbZYDxkEoP5vsM+/FF4lCGtZzsHMx59g07xzQ2tf59qKeT4H0ljaYvV8S7q+aqV9y/Ti57Td936BFL5ysOkB4nb3gnoO1sJeouFk/9RmuFKBnpiwwncP4c0MjOPMnxxzqmgoUSkjVw1VhRqWDrSntmBeQuCVsM/mXJPHMEPyQ9pc2htGMrHDo9H2OP/CdS5w+9UBlWoTutAnARjr0Gz0QnRGeMarWvSwHmXuzxA==
Received: from ka-mbx01.SIDN.local ([192.168.2.177]) by arn2-kamx.sidn.nl with ESMTP id uAAAcoD2024901-uAAAcoD4024901 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=CAFAIL); Thu, 10 Nov 2016 11:38:50 +0100
Received: from ka-mbx02.SIDN.local (192.168.2.178) by ka-mbx01.SIDN.local (192.168.2.177) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1130.7; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 11:38:50 +0100
Received: from ka-mbx02.SIDN.local ([fe80::9855:369a:1ca4:6549]) by ka-mbx02.SIDN.local ([fe80::9855:369a:1ca4:6549%13]) with mapi id 15.00.1130.005; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 11:38:50 +0100
From: Rik Ribbers <rik.ribbers@sidn.nl>
To: Job Snijders <job@instituut.net>
Thread-Topic: [regext] draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay unreasonably stuck on IPR?
Thread-Index: AQHSOoOdxGbhaov/3UKbKg+ts6rRraDQmBYAgABVqICAAQgaAIAAAZuA
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 10:38:50 +0000
Message-ID: <9D84D34E-6016-40AC-B6FE-A23837BCEED2@sidn.nl>
References: <20161108144742.GH2473@Hanna.local> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A4BC33E@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <20161109093524.GC89276@Vurt.local> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A4BCC19@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <20161109134114.GK2473@Hanna.local> <C851A2CF-B946-4E3E-8799-585851CDEB77@antoin.nl> <20161110103304.GL89276@Vurt.local>
In-Reply-To: <20161110103304.GL89276@Vurt.local>
Accept-Language: nl-NL, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.168.7.58]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9D84D34E601640ACB6FEA23837BCEED2sidnnl_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/KbFKvdRUhQRsKi14JPvR6gXTzSc>
Cc: "Livesay, Paul" <plivesay@verisign.com>, Antoin Verschuren <ietf@antoin.nl>, "alissa@cooperw.in" <alissa@cooperw.in>, "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Subject: Re: [regext] draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay unreasonably stuck on IPR?
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 10:38:58 -0000

+1

I encourage every member of this working group to state their opinion.

On 10 Nov 2016, at 11:33, Job Snijders <job@instituut.net<mailto:job@instituut.net>> wrote:

TL;DR: the working group should move forward and disregard Verisign's IPR claim.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email