IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [regext] draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay unreasonably stuck on IPR?

Rik Ribbers <rik.ribbers@sidn.nl> Thu, 10 November 2016 07:44 UTC

Return-Path: <rik.ribbers@sidn.nl>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9FB812946D for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Nov 2016 23:44:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.797
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.797 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sidn.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HiwGSUvu2VGL for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Nov 2016 23:44:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from arn2-kamx.sidn.nl (kamx.sidn.nl [IPv6:2a00:d78:0:147:94:198:152:69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACC3C129430 for <regext@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Nov 2016 23:44:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; d=sidn.nl; s=sidn-nl; c=relaxed/relaxed; h=from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:x-mailer:x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype:x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader:x-originating-ip:content-type:mime-version; bh=R34pcZ/JOrSFcFRWj8xTND6a/Ri1gKtijv1z7LI0Zcc=; b=VlgS0sx0cKrAKh2fvvkDax9jfiVr8EyAo/mOk072obNTKLxdZGnZeyqM97vSKEwnC5r3tswGdQ1sTT2md7ICt/foKDcu27I9AXRAd1PKjMnePNSZQ+V1hy7Y4gDY37uuemGKuYBwI6IZaguxG0DyNDSLXjBG8eIwvHIKmvOkSST0vbcYAqERNbMXV/KPhDmLwlnWJfg26Pk+4oAfgT7331uinbBx3Fl0rzrupHP68r+7RFsOb2JHHTA9HFU6/EeRipB3I9Lj8C3Gp1frqy7N9v9c9QQTUjvPopiq09X6nmlq5NSKFZonIpT9x5/v8ElCYiGCV/SyQdBN8lhwF48+pg==
Received: from ka-mbx02.SIDN.local ([192.168.2.178]) by arn2-kamx.sidn.nl with ESMTP id uAA7iErO015671-uAA7iErQ015671 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=CAFAIL); Thu, 10 Nov 2016 08:44:14 +0100
Received: from ka-mbx02.SIDN.local (192.168.2.178) by ka-mbx02.SIDN.local (192.168.2.178) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1130.7; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 08:44:14 +0100
Received: from ka-mbx02.SIDN.local ([fe80::9855:369a:1ca4:6549]) by ka-mbx02.SIDN.local ([fe80::9855:369a:1ca4:6549%13]) with mapi id 15.00.1130.005; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 08:44:14 +0100
From: Rik Ribbers <rik.ribbers@sidn.nl>
To: Antoin Verschuren <ietf@antoin.nl>
Thread-Topic: [regext] draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay unreasonably stuck on IPR?
Thread-Index: AQHSOoOdxGbhaov/3UKbKg+ts6rRraDQmBYAgABVqICAANjtgA==
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 07:44:14 +0000
Message-ID: <D4F44DCF-8789-4139-A006-2AA78CBEC082@sidn.nl>
References: <20161108144742.GH2473@Hanna.local> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A4BC33E@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <20161109093524.GC89276@Vurt.local> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A4BCC19@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <20161109134114.GK2473@Hanna.local> <C851A2CF-B946-4E3E-8799-585851CDEB77@antoin.nl>
In-Reply-To: <C851A2CF-B946-4E3E-8799-585851CDEB77@antoin.nl>
Accept-Language: nl-NL, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.168.7.58]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D4F44DCF87894139A0062AA78CBEC082sidnnl_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/9km8oDp-W6_Gy2-A7RJfU9ho5_0>
Cc: Job Snijders <job@instituut.net>, "alissa@cooperw.in" <alissa@cooperw.in>, Scott Hollenbeck <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, "Livesay, Paul" <plivesay@verisign.com>, "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Subject: Re: [regext] draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay unreasonably stuck on IPR?
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 07:44:27 -0000

First of all thanks Antoin for your excellent reply.  lots of +1 in there.

On 9 Nov 2016, at 19:47, Antoin Verschuren <ietf@antoin.nl<mailto:ietf@antoin.nl>> wrote:

Jim has asked for this before, with little to no response to call consensus to have this draft proceed, so I would like to ask you again to state your opinion on this mailinglist so Jim can summarize them in a response to the IESG.

We all know what is going to happen now… we have been waiting for a response for almost a year now and nothing happens in the WG. So the document is not only stalled on a IPR-disclosure without licensing details but also on a WG that is not willing to discuss this.

So I propose an option 3: Describe the situation to the IESG and from this (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/wHlAx8OrF_r5DiSWhr8LuMk860g_) mail conversation Stephen will (unhappy with the crappy situation) clears his DISCUSS. At least this gets the document of the plate from the WG and takes the discussion to the IESG where the document and the IPR disclosure can be discussed in a broader context then just keyrelay and the REGEXT WG.

Gr,
Rik

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email