Re: [regext] draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay unreasonably stuck on IPR?

[S Moonesamy <[e-mail]>]

Hi Rik, Stephen,

[ietf@ removed from Cc]

At 11:53 08-11-2016, Rik Ribbers wrote:
>Yes, this was addressed during the IESG review last december and 
>resulted in the latest version. The only thing blocking is the IPR-disclosure

Thank you for confirming that.

At 11:57 08-11-2016, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>As to the meat of this, my discuss says "the DISCUSS is to ask
>did I miss stuff and if not how can WG participants have
>rationally considered an IPR declaration if the licensing
>information will only arrive "later" after the document is
>approved to become an RFC?"

[snip]

>I also chatted with Job about this a while back and indicated
>that I'd be willing to clear (though not happy to clear) if the
>response from the WG (via the chairs or AD) were something like
>"the WG has consensus to live with the crap situation, seems
>like it's not improving and we don't have anyone saying it out
>be blocking."  I don't think I ever did hear that back from anyone
>though. Had I, I would have cleared the discuss. (And apologies
>if I missed a statement to that effect.)

Thanks.  I gather that the above is clear enough for the Working 
Group to address the DISCUSS.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy