IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [regext] draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay unreasonably stuck on IPR?

Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@NLnetLabs.nl> Mon, 28 November 2016 15:21 UTC

Return-Path: <jaap@NLnetLabs.nl>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18288129F16 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 07:21:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l_WE7569w08H for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 07:21:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bela.nlnetlabs.nl (bela.nlnetlabs.nl [IPv6:2a04:b900::1:0:0:15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57481129413 for <regext@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 07:21:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bela.nlnetlabs.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bela.nlnetlabs.nl (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id uASFLhci025980; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 16:21:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jaap@NLnetLabs.nl)
Message-Id: <201611281521.uASFLhci025980@bela.nlnetlabs.nl>
To: Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl>
From: Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@NLnetLabs.nl>
In-reply-to: <20161110103746.nhgp5mgz6ndczrlt@miek.nl>
References: <20161108144742.GH2473@Hanna.local> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A4BC33E@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <20161109093524.GC89276@Vurt.local> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A4BCC19@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <20161109134114.GK2473@Hanna.local> <C851A2CF-B946-4E3E-8799-585851CDEB77@antoin.nl> <20161110103304.GL89276@Vurt.local> <20161110103746.nhgp5mgz6ndczrlt@miek.nl>
Comments: In-reply-to Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl> message dated "Thu, 10 Nov 2016 10:37:46 +0000."
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <25978.1480346503.1@bela.nlnetlabs.nl>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 16:21:43 +0100
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.1 (bela.nlnetlabs.nl [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 28 Nov 2016 16:21:44 +0100 (CET)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/kz5Lgm1WA4qVSjoyl84NHJprsF4>
Cc: "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [regext] draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay unreasonably stuck on IPR?
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 15:21:49 -0000

 Miek Gieben writes:

 > 
 > 
 > [ Quoting <job@instituut.net> in "Re: [regext] draft-ietf-eppext-keyr..." ]
 > >Dear Working Group,
 > >
 > >TL;DR: the working group should move forward and disregard Verisign's IPR claim.
 > 
 > +1 from me on this.
 > 

Given all the argments I've seen on this list, going ahead seems to be
the only way out of this stalemate.

	jaap

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email