IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [regext] draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay unreasonably stuck on IPR?

Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl> Thu, 10 November 2016 10:37 UTC

Return-Path: <miek@miek.nl>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A123A1295C5 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 02:37:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=miek-nl.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CEOLR7HjMy_v for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 02:37:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x231.google.com (mail-wm0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 192701295ED for <regext@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 02:37:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x231.google.com with SMTP id f82so22227733wmf.1 for <regext@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 02:37:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=miek-nl.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=yVmc/yvdfNq2chPZUOTh+vAeSBA7PyumZuStl+7h6o0=; b=hMv4bWy9ZJcUFiPdXlmL/8ZTWCFvT9tqK0nAHmiDp3ug2vjILU6voUhh3UiNe8D+4P 91Oxzd9GGbuvPXSPm2ml+9vO7CGH4lf14oXcpXn51c5NdPnlWIT59LeZpCTKdphi7CJ7 zbKpCdRj9nIyLaWmIcdx3T+HUneSuX6spXbzynGdpT0cn77Cb12lctR4vL4+kVKJHnHp TH6AOhJQv2wM97+wBMdPWPimcTRH/ahg+VaGJ5vmyUq5v3BXxpga5lTJEmTgEU8coOVg wqUk06wJVlCFAL+PUFBc8DZPLQY5PCXlWzCueE0Ar0RqPFEdKQcaPBUeomReROtaxp1Q xIQQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=yVmc/yvdfNq2chPZUOTh+vAeSBA7PyumZuStl+7h6o0=; b=cNI9YM3BkRWsQf89FktQBO/VqG31gGUYbrqCDQBZITXj4n2U/A5Zt/D9o8np4KtTaL LBWhBrg0fxqBB9o4j/GxEBF1mCyfcO2Ak5ygY80urvnPyEamqz32XO+1fJVlYkyIYja0 ZIXiC4oSVIqbtj44ClWJtDeQ0//hmmjIw/sSDeK2V+X1lkJ70F5i6klLNzNuVi0nqUtk k0lDo69xrhq8hYuxmZfdx4oOA25EN8//YdplfEFLEA9PSq7xVVkjGU2KKQtyJ3m8KgUX rQDBf16UQPvPC9DUHl2xt6EOq6osVqf5b/5AKVh++J9z7kUp3JibOmWVC2A57qYu/GXs mTWA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvd7+N+X2qHWEQvghK5jMf1g+USpRIBXW/E5U9YYVzggdJu58WXsN1zBSQJOEMP+1g==
X-Received: by 10.194.87.230 with SMTP id bb6mr4280945wjb.163.1478774267687; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 02:37:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miek.nl ([2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:fe79:234c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g6sm4662746wjp.45.2016.11.10.02.37.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 10 Nov 2016 02:37:46 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 10:37:46 +0000
From: Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl>
To: Job Snijders <job@instituut.net>
Message-ID: <20161110103746.nhgp5mgz6ndczrlt@miek.nl>
References: <20161108144742.GH2473@Hanna.local> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A4BC33E@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <20161109093524.GC89276@Vurt.local> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A4BCC19@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <20161109134114.GK2473@Hanna.local> <C851A2CF-B946-4E3E-8799-585851CDEB77@antoin.nl> <20161110103304.GL89276@Vurt.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20161110103304.GL89276@Vurt.local>
User-Agent: Vim/Mutt/Linux
X-Home: http://www.miek.nl
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/V5RlHrCfrPrtVzEuJiXX6VvLNYg>
Cc: "Livesay, Paul" <plivesay@verisign.com>, Antoin Verschuren <ietf@antoin.nl>, alissa@cooperw.in, "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Subject: Re: [regext] draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay unreasonably stuck on IPR?
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 10:37:51 -0000

[ Quoting <job@instituut.net> in "Re: [regext] draft-ietf-eppext-keyr..." ]
>Dear Working Group,
>
>TL;DR: the working group should move forward and disregard Verisign's IPR claim.

+1 from me on this.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email