Re: [rrg] Summary of RANGI//re: belated msg: further description of the recommendation process
Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Tue, 15 December 2009 09:50 UTC
Return-Path: <tony.li@tony.li>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D75B3A69B6 for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:50:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.037
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.037 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.227, BAYES_00=-2.599, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rrm+6eS6r4JM for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:50:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from QMTA09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.96]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F01FC3A67B3 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:50:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from OMTA17.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.73]) by QMTA09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id HMpp1d0031afHeLA9MppVZ; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:49:49 +0000
Received: from [192.168.0.110] ([24.6.155.154]) by OMTA17.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id HMpo1d0023L8a8Q8dMppff; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:49:49 +0000
Message-ID: <4B275BBA.5060902@tony.li>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:49:46 -0800
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Xu Xiaohu <xuxh@huawei.com>
References: <003101ca7d35$79779820$d40c6f0a@china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <003101ca7d35$79779820$d40c6f0a@china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: rrg@irtf.org, 'Lixia Zhang' <lixia@CS.UCLA.EDU>
Subject: Re: [rrg] Summary of RANGI//re: belated msg: further description of the recommendation process
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:50:05 -0000
Received. T Xu Xiaohu wrote: > >> -----邮件原件----- >> 发件人: rrg-bounces@irtf.org [mailto:rrg-bounces@irtf.org] 代表 Lixia > Zhang >> 发送时间: 2009年12月11日 13:54 >> 收件人: rrg@irtf.org >> 主题: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the recommendation process >> >> sorry folks, day job crisis delayed this msg for a few days. >> >> Tony and I have had some discussions on how to collect the >> recommendation document. One comment we have heard repeated from a >> number of people is that our recommendation should document the pros >> and cons of different approaches, which can be very valuable, even >> independent from whichever specific recommendations we may end up with. >> >> 1/ To steer efforts toward that goal, we would like each proposal to >> make a concise summary, preferably no longer than ~1000 words (it may >> contain pointer to more detailed document), that describes the key >> ideas of the proposal of exactly how it addresses routing scalability >> issue, where is its cost, and where is its gain. > > Hi Lixia and Tony, > > Summary of Routing Architecture for the Next Generation Internet (RANGI) is > as follows: > > 1. Key idea: > Similar to HIP [RFC4423], RANGI introduces a host identifier layer between > the network layer and the transport layer, and the transport-layer > associations (i.e., TCP connections) are no longer bound to IP addresses, > but to host identifiers. The major difference from the HIP is that the host > identifier in RANGI is a 128-bit hierarchical and cryptographic identifier > which has organizational structure. As a result, the corresponding > ID->locator mapping system for such identifiers has reasonable business > model and clear trust boundaries. In addition, RANGI uses IPv4-embeded IPv6 > addresses as locators. The LD ID (i.e., the leftmost 96 bits) of this > locator is a provider-assigned /96 IPv6 prefix, while the last four octets > of this locator is a local IPv4 address (either public or private). This > special locator could be used to realize 6over4 automatic tunneling > (borrowing ideas from ISATAP [RFC5214]), which will reduce the deployment > cost of this new routing architecture. Within RANGI, the mappings from FQDN > to host identifiers are stored in the DNS system, while the mappings from > host identifiers to locators are stored in a distributed id/locator mapping > system (e.g., a hierarchical Distributed Hash Table (DHT) system, or a > reverse DNS system). > > 2. Gains: > > RANGI achieves almost all of goals set by RRG as follows: > > 1) Routing Scalability: Scalability is achieved by decoupling identifiers > from locators. > 2) Traffic Engineering: Hosts located in a multi-homed site can suggest the > upstream ISP for outbound and inbound traffics, while the first-hop LDBR (i. > e., site border router) has the final decision right on the upstream ISP > selection. > 3) Mobility and Multi-homing: Sessions will not be interrupted due to > locator change in cases of mobility or multi-homing. > 4) Simplified Renumbering: When changing providers, the local IPv4 addresses > of the site do not need to change. Hence the internal routers within the > site don’t need renumbering. > 5) Decoupling Location and Identifier: Obvious. > 6) Routing Stability: Since the locators are topologically aggregatable and > the internal topology within LD will not be disclosed outside, the routing > stability could be improved greatly. > 7) Routing Security: RANGI reuses the current routing system and does not > introduce any new security risk into the routing system. > 8) Incremental Deployability: RANGI allows easy transition from IPv4 network > to IPv6 network. In addition, RANGI proxy allows RANGI-aware hosts to > communicate to legacy IPv4 or IPv6 hosts, and vice versa. > > 3. Costs: > 1) Host change is required; > 2) First-hop LDBR change is required to support site-controlled > traffic-engineering capability. > 3) The ID->Locator mapping system is a new infrastructure to be deployed. > 4) Proxy needs to be deployed for communication between RANGI-aware hosts > and legacy hosts. > > 4. Documents: > RANGI => http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-xu-rangi-01.txt. > RANGI Proxy => http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-xu-rangi-proxy-01.txt. > RANGI Presentation on IETF76 => > http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/09nov/slides/RRG-1.ppt > > _______________________________________________ > rrg mailing list > rrg@irtf.org > http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
- [rrg] belated msg: further description of the rec… Lixia Zhang
- Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the… Patrick Frejborg
- Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the… Michael Menth
- Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the… Robin Whittle
- Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the… Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the… Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the… Scott Brim
- Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the… Noel Chiappa
- [rrg] On mapping systems Michael Menth
- Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the… Vince Fuller
- Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the… Brian E Carpenter
- [rrg] Summary of RANGI//re: belated msg: further … Xu Xiaohu
- Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the… Lixia Zhang
- Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the… Lixia Zhang
- Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the… Lixia Zhang
- Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the… Lixia Zhang
- Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the… Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] Summary of RANGI//re: belated msg: furt… Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the… Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the… $witch
- Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the… Charrie Sun
- Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the… Noel Chiappa
- Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the… HeinerHummel
- Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the… Flinck, Hannu (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the… Patrick Frejborg
- Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the… heinerhummel
- Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the… Flinck, Hannu (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the… Yangyang Wang
- [rrg] Summary of GLI-Split Michael Menth
- Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the… Lixia Zhang