IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the recommendation process

Lixia Zhang <lixia@cs.ucla.edu> Tue, 15 December 2009 06:32 UTC

Return-Path: <lixia@cs.ucla.edu>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C430B3A6810 for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:32:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.077, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YgxSh-NYA9lG for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:32:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [131.179.128.62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCCB43A67EE for <rrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:32:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5E2839E80F0; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:21:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp.cs.ucla.edu
Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tfa0rWtHH65O; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:21:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.1.3] (cpe-98-151-23-234.socal.res.rr.com [98.151.23.234]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B6AB539E80D9; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:21:43 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <BAF9298C-4167-4D3C-891F-4F0710EB441A@cs.ucla.edu>
From: Lixia Zhang <lixia@cs.ucla.edu>
To: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <4B26660E.5020109@tony.li>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:21:43 -0800
References: <5976B445-7209-4DE5-9D83-E2920265EB27@CS.UCLA.EDU> <5bc37fd40912110555qf59abdcu7fa1c514774649c3@mail.gmail.com> <4B2578CC.1020105@firstpr.com.au> <4B26660E.5020109@tony.li>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: rrg@irtf.org, Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
Subject: Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the recommendation process
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:32:20 -0000

On Dec 14, 2009, at 8:21 AM, Tony Li wrote:

> Robin Whittle wrote:
>> Short version:   The RRG Design Goals document cold be used as the
>>                 basis for a "template", but was based on very
>>                 little discussion and AFAIK has not achieved
>>                 consensus.
>
>
> Robin,
>
> When the discussion of the design goals slowed, we judged that to  
> indicate rough consensus.

(no hat) consensus should be explicitly solicited, rather than  
implicitly assumed.

BTW folks I'm having problems access the RRG WIKI page (when I tried  
to login, got database error), will try again later to get the current  
proposal candidates added there.

Lixia

>>                 I suggest that concise summaries mention how
>>                 suitable the proposal is for voluntary adoption in
>>                 IPv4 and IPv6 - perhaps with reference to this list
>>                 of constraints:
>>              http://www.firstpr.com.au/ip/ivip/RRG-2009/constraints/
>
>
> While you're more than welcome to do so, this is not a requirement.
>
> Tony
> _______________________________________________
> rrg mailing list
> rrg@irtf.org
> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email