IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Call for adoption of QoS draft

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Mon, 10 September 2012 16:55 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6990721E803C for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 09:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v99bVSwdMSY9 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 09:55:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com (mail-ey0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 798F921E8037 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 09:55:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by eaai11 with SMTP id i11so1032061eaa.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 09:55:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=iw1P59xEZyUS6XGHJSRS1K6vT2IA6lUigxnx9l3CJPo=; b=i8pxzmqKHmfN7UM4vBW4rxjxYdgZDs7q339zxSnSIIMO/xfAdo7cdxT4Tkd7Tx4AXC 6CCSG3RXtATpHFugV2kKImhzan0sTitqXbLoaEWNddrOJbfE8JOD/BjV94X5s3Ij6yGg lIJzwkNgE2RIGGqtGzmCUHO/9ZX4jEJgV6eRVFGGKfzMlmWY9ISxjP5Zptyx4KJXgDnk vu5zgd95G/cqu662uJkNB6SDrk3tNT/nD3YduCnONL2KOCy42ibddfu47j7sBxVhm9ih n4BjVndPab1SwuwYYJLLB70irnnp4U3KbrzCnntR7tcqKY0dzX7DkpgVJrsQ/LFxoF7a qIYg==
Received: by 10.14.224.4 with SMTP id w4mr20896865eep.21.1347296120626; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 09:55:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.14.187.10 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 09:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [74.95.2.173]
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnVGkBseamm-rE8KjnoK0u=NwZoHjwoffRQATE4YmURfBw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+9kkMBo10T=EgRXmkeB1vfB6MdUMVeWUpZowoXdP=E_+rm+mQ@mail.gmail.com> <504DF4F4.9080401@alvestrand.no> <CABkgnnVGkBseamm-rE8KjnoK0u=NwZoHjwoffRQATE4YmURfBw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 09:54:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBNZd+kWup5cVhLwVLNNOJg8tP=dO-JD0dqxtd5PtKyAmA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm3MerUTCW/JvvYUqKSMW7VELr/932Wrigyf1qX4/2PsGsv3Wd471iyT9mS8V87YKLrCqAG
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Call for adoption of QoS draft
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:55:27 -0000

On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Martin Thomson
<martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think that the work is valuable and useful.
>
> However, I have concerns about how priorities are communicated to the browser.
>
> I know that this introduces an interesting case of where the
> artificial division of labour between rtcweb and WebRTC breaks down,
> but the recent ruling in the W3C implies that this would require SDP
> work (unless there is something that I missed).  That would then imply
> that this (new) work doesn't fit the rtweb charter and should go to
> MMUSIC.

Why would this require SDP work?

I would assume that this would be a setting on the media stream/track.
or alternately, a hint.

-Ekr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email