IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Call for adoption of QoS draft

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 11 September 2012 00:32 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F6F21F862A for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:32:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c7YyAwpIsNIO for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:32:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94AB321F861F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:32:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lahm15 with SMTP id m15so1665222lah.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:32:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=d5dlIFQKB1hMFm3bb3HCk3FCY0UsUXAACRGOnVyv0/Q=; b=N8jOgP3n48ytkcsehsOHw1bJJNoW94axNs0H/VUp5ghryueewDRwuNtxhUe9xJ/Mfe AmgEGY3KjJY5/KYAOILZ99iU2S/FsYEphZn6jKfNJ8pR/RUeKDuZSGVN/2DylQy8il38 b2UUO9Ux5Wm2pKpM9O+0qDZSPyVutYuCcJhBE6PiKCApie0At5u3FxAnJDi6M20BtT/8 CjrRun3i4Tdu7lyHKzni1zsWufSY0yUL3Y1oFGy+CGvbxKPQxLPVVyamebzzdcSKpy89 czBBt/4KOGAnA8w7iR82bKIMjm6EZKJ0DMC+K8la1gBQ1phM0H94jpM3q+f5Q+ySc+6e XCjQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.123.133 with SMTP id ma5mr14122805lab.8.1347323560526; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:32:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.1.36 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:32:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201209110016.q8B0GQ6x025835@mtv-core-2.cisco.com>
References: <CA+9kkMBo10T=EgRXmkeB1vfB6MdUMVeWUpZowoXdP=E_+rm+mQ@mail.gmail.com> <504DF4F4.9080401@alvestrand.no> <CABkgnnVGkBseamm-rE8KjnoK0u=NwZoHjwoffRQATE4YmURfBw@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBNZd+kWup5cVhLwVLNNOJg8tP=dO-JD0dqxtd5PtKyAmA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnU2tQgXTwgFAdBP4_0L9AviEUZ2kGOg0NH5xVQM8qZybQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBNiQqGKey8H0wqLz3VA9s1=0wySCf=406OdO12sQykf4w@mail.gmail.com> <201209102113.q8ALD0qQ018125@mtv-core-2.cisco.com> <CABkgnnUj9Q1M6KqEFxSqOZfUNxR2XY4aS1vcxDKpXNsSd+g6=A@mail.gmail.com> <201209110016.q8B0GQ6x025835@mtv-core-2.cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:32:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnV0JEhzf1wXaUX6_5C42tMTYwWJO8XA3S2Z=CK7gCKrRQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: James Polk <jmpolk@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Call for adoption of QoS draft
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 00:32:42 -0000

On 10 September 2012 17:16, James Polk <jmpolk@cisco.com> wrote:
> At 04:27 PM 9/10/2012, Martin Thomson wrote:
>> It looks like some more definition work is needed.
>
> perhaps, and I'm not at all opposed to comments to the TCL draft within
> MMUSIC to address whatever folks think is important.

I don't think that this necessarily translates to TCL draft work.
More that it is becoming clear to me that the qos draft is both a)
new, and b) not in alignment with the TCL stuff.  I'd be happy to be
convinced otherwise, and I'm sure that it can be rectified.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email