IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Call for adoption of QoS draft

Igor Faynberg <igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com> Fri, 07 September 2012 21:04 UTC

Return-Path: <igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4089621F8672 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 14:04:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DhR8+pMT2rZS for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 14:04:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail3.lucent.com (ihemail3.lucent.com [135.245.0.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2A921F8671 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 14:04:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usnavsmail2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.10]) by ihemail3.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id q87L4Rl8005541 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 16:04:28 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (umail-ce2.ndc.lucent.com [135.3.40.63]) by usnavsmail2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id q87L4R0J020117 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 16:04:27 -0500
Received: from [135.244.193.66] (faynberg.lra.lucent.com [135.244.193.66]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id q87L4OCp010223; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 16:04:26 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <504A6157.90604@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 17:04:23 -0400
From: Igor Faynberg <igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com>
Organization: Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <CA+9kkMBo10T=EgRXmkeB1vfB6MdUMVeWUpZowoXdP=E_+rm+mQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMBo10T=EgRXmkeB1vfB6MdUMVeWUpZowoXdP=E_+rm+mQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.37
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.10
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Call for adoption of QoS draft
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 21:04:35 -0000

I am all for it, especially that with Dan's agreeing to edit it, the 
document will be in good hands!

Igor

On 9/7/2012 11:27 AM, Ted Hardie wrote:
> Based on the feedback at the last working group meeting, the chairs
> believe that there is general support for creating a document that
> describes the QoS issues relating to RTCWEB.  We would like to call
> for adoption of draft-jennings-rtcweb-qos-00 as the input draft.  Dan
> Druta has agreed to serve as the WG document editor, should this
> document move forward.
>
> Please send comments to the list by  September 16, 2012
>
> Ted and Magnus
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email