IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] My Opinion: Why I think a negotiating protocol is a Good Thing

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com> Tue, 18 October 2011 20:59 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9335021F8B9E for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:59:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.535
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.535 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.064, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xUe31csVi8LH for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:59:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-3.cisco.com (mtv-iport-3.cisco.com [173.36.130.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1806921F8B9D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:59:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fluffy@cisco.com; l=318; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1318971591; x=1320181191; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Hs57VplFF8aiFvUDc1Wk5PBl/EGMFfejpEdFOdspDR0=; b=hM0EjltFwh4qFg/hnxiX3MRh/gt3YzgjSHQSEFXBUrY+SF38mzed5fqo UTDLJPzP3sURXMvSYejEpRpXwLqKsQwYhNI/cpNaXDGXRYbZNB2lrgJ8B y23+SV+eQiXMD1JK37Yx6UA14qRvbNu6yVIXtyn73wVA6pzQEHTJ4TwP0 k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAE7onU6rRDoJ/2dsb2JhbABEqG6BBYFuAQEBAwESAWYFCwtGVwY1h16XbwGeSoc6YQSIAot7kXY
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,366,1315180800"; d="scan'208";a="8703650"
Received: from mtv-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.58.9]) by mtv-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Oct 2011 20:59:51 +0000
Received: from dhcp-171-70-217-213.cisco.com (dhcp-171-70-217-213.cisco.com [171.70.217.213]) by mtv-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9IKwkNR016244; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:59:50 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <9B03E9E2-4376-465E-84F5-EDAC51390408@phonefromhere.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:59:51 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B5F4C6D1-3F54-4242-A89C-C2FC66AF8E7D@cisco.com>
References: <4E9D667A.2040703@alvestrand.no> <9B03E9E2-4376-465E-84F5-EDAC51390408@phonefromhere.com>
To: Tim Panton <tim@phonefromhere.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1)
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] My Opinion: Why I think a negotiating protocol is a Good Thing
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:59:51 -0000

On Oct 18, 2011, at 5:53 , Tim Panton wrote:

> We have an API with blobs only because we chose to stick with the ugliness that is SDP.

One of the most compelling argument to me to stick with SDP is that I have a hard time imagining anyone creating a replacement for it in less than a year or two.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email