Re: [rtcweb] We are moving beyond the assumptions on which O/A is based

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 14 May 2013 20:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 347B121F8E7C for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 May 2013 13:45:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A0y1Q6CO3KAk for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 May 2013 13:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22a.google.com (mail-ie0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7774021F8F6E for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 May 2013 13:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f170.google.com with SMTP id aq17so2115818iec.1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 May 2013 13:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=I+26YESaG+2g4GimqH98aeY7emP7Yh5PC0Mb8yoj9ig=; b=C2fzIQZPSci3qu/pGbA7Sa9H+nR1WqvGrDnqgjrC/tFmVTuUuLjeI5Pedzn7sMhQXd t+P8ay9mOz8ckCK5R8uZ9rZZvqmMe9LSCD9K3TN5jxpXxoXY0YqgESVCDw3zqnhfZvhr I0KP4gPldRlEmkE0tripd9IoMHpDBe0GfZ7a1WDoDgGpZxN7xfnJSS7scWLPKHxrAjKG Eou3QgxxOJGGpCBtc1j19a2UMdE26EAukb0NUcO0+ufO+3DrNvyHbkg3iLkUL+HP0VSO WyaXPupgDxQi8H2N5HtMbELnBaU2gZO9Dwq/Yxkg/lJqxhA18FrqGtScffq1jEJB64RV Zdew==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.117.101 with SMTP id kd5mr3455532igb.12.1368564300036; Tue, 14 May 2013 13:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.79.73 with HTTP; Tue, 14 May 2013 13:44:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <519283AC.9020908@alum.mit.edu>
References: <20130503054601.4639.64651.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALe60zAi_Lx3QFCbBQ5aPNkgorJAff0E79jkpbQX1Qt3wf2bzg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-1Wk6u7XiYrNVmoqr5Jisu2WRvZpte7hQTOiP8YHUc6hg@mail.gmail.com> <518A1268.8090107@ericsson.com> <01AB1BF5-7ABF-4DD3-A831-3A6C96EA680C@iii.ca> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C2C818F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <518E7700.1080906@alum.mit.edu> <CA+9kkMDXRnfm6Bto4k6SB-FZHYDCfH1HWUZVat3uJmqFUQpXkw@mail.gmail.com> <519283AC.9020908@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 13:44:59 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMA5X9eaC=-FH2FoB6dEhZF0p-nn=LWRr9h0_-5kaUOSuw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e011826f8f50b3c04dcb3b4c6"
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] We are moving beyond the assumptions on which O/A is based
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 20:45:01 -0000

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>wrote:

Certainly. If the web server supporting the browser


I assume by this you meant the javascript application; it's possible for
the web server to support the CLUE semantics but a particular client not to
(e.g. a mobile client connecting to the server).


> does't support clue then this isn't going to result in a clue call. But
> that would only come up for *received* calls, and receiving such a call via
> rtcweb depends on having an app that is at least addressable by a clue
> client. That means it must have a sip address. If so, then at least it will
> probably be able to connect as a "legacy" sip device.
>
>
So, just to confirm my understanding, in this scenario, the webrtc client
is sitting in an open screen somewhere, connected to a web server (it could
be headless, but bare with me).  When a CLUE conference starts that the
webserver believes is of interest to the webrtc client it uses the existing
connection to notify it and give it conference details.  Is that right so
far?

If that is the case, I'm not sure what you mean by "must have a SIP
address".  Can you clarify this?

My concern it that it be *possible* to do this with rtcweb, preferably
> obscure gateway code.
>
>
I'm assuming that a "without" is missing here, but can you confirm?

regards,

Ted


>         Thanks,
>         Paul
>
>