IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] New Version Notification for draft-uberti-rtcweb-plan-00.txt

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Sat, 11 May 2013 14:14 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2311821F8EF2 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 May 2013 07:14:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.188
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.188 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.488, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sZfxsqa363oU for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 May 2013 07:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qe0-f47.google.com (mail-qe0-f47.google.com [209.85.128.47]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 377B021F8E4C for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 May 2013 07:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qe0-f47.google.com with SMTP id w7so2931970qeb.20 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 May 2013 07:14:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=zr7GWwivUiTiLhyI8G9Xv305PswGb/fJcwJcXztq7Vo=; b=E6PpI501jYLsd05dbo9oSp2w5yd4asM9TRSRo+oKiX2YqiA+HUmoJWxHQu863g2xSM uJHK20dy3vfNNIBbH6Oj6xvip/a9/h8sR9Ga7XrfjC1IN8qpZBSXEXAqMzwdV0X6igET RIBvPwUT4avVgklVnqpbYmIxrjP6CCjTD7kiieGsyVqJ0JCgeHPLIy5CKsJetovbxD+j rOvty4WqjmHGF1KyUnRBYNY42z+NKFVTdyuFErqYEA9/iHgs78LlP+d3Tifke9v2Uoj3 DnE7lTYK/lytNxA483d+obiAu/3rgeEhcFPfH/GFrTlVQTLJwLMSajLbQ6HQdQHrSdns A89g==
X-Received: by 10.224.98.9 with SMTP id o9mr15334434qan.31.1368281687684; Sat, 11 May 2013 07:14:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.96.169 with HTTP; Sat, 11 May 2013 07:14:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [74.95.2.168]
In-Reply-To: <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C2C818F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <20130503054601.4639.64651.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALe60zAi_Lx3QFCbBQ5aPNkgorJAff0E79jkpbQX1Qt3wf2bzg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-1Wk6u7XiYrNVmoqr5Jisu2WRvZpte7hQTOiP8YHUc6hg@mail.gmail.com> <518A1268.8090107@ericsson.com> <01AB1BF5-7ABF-4DD3-A831-3A6C96EA680C@iii.ca> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C2C818F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 07:14:07 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPFugYsy1O8kQBvpDgdhDjJ5Ou4T6WuzjPCZ2qF5kP4xA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf3074d7d0f289c304dc71e7b3"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmwegaBvFkHxOM532RZ5kEoJe/Zna93VmRqRJN77wPBHndxEkRmoWzZ/QqwD5jZW+CdNYgt
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] New Version Notification for draft-uberti-rtcweb-plan-00.txt
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 14:14:54 -0000

On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK <
stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote:
>
> As I read draft-uberti-rtcweb-plan-00, no API changes are needed or
> proposed, and the call flows could stay the same (but as I recollect the
> discussion at the Boston interim they should be changed for other reasons).


I wanted to address this point in isolation...

I believe that both Plan A and Plan B require at least one change to
the API: the ability to indicate that a stream is important and thus
requires backward-compatible treatment. In Plan A this means
not marking it bundle-only. In Plan B it means putting it on its own
m-line.

-Ekr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email