Re: [rtcweb] Open data channel issues

[Randell Jesup <[e-mail]>]

On 3/4/2014 2:00 AM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 4 March 2014 03:38, Randell Jesup <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> To take your suggestion:
>> a) applications assume 16KB if ndata wasn't negotiated (per the current
>> suggestion)
>> b) implement ndata and EOR support in the browsers, and drop the 16KB limit
>> when ndata is negotiated.
>> All this needs is "is ndata supported by this association" exposed to the
>> app; no sdp changes needed.  (One less dependency!)
>
> Or, to avoid vestigal crap in the API in the end state, when you
> install the 16K limitation, add an indicator that applications can
> check.  Once you remove the cap, remove the indicator.
>
> if (dataChannel.isNotVeryGood) {
>    chunkMessage(message);
> } else {
>    dataChannel.send(message);
> }

Yup, that works for me.  dataChannel.requiresFragmentation would be the 
wordy version or mustFragmentAt16K for self-documentation.

-- 
Randell Jesup -- rjesup a t mozilla d o t com