IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion

Matthew Kaufman <matthew.kaufman@skype.net> Wed, 05 October 2011 02:49 UTC

Return-Path: <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E78AD21F8C10 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 19:49:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.735
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.735 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.864, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xDsBcMCrzfoR for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 19:49:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.skype.net (mx.skype.net [78.141.177.88]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E930B21F8C16 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 19:49:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.skype.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3993A16F6; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 04:52:29 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=skype.net; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mx; bh=SP9ChRO/GQJ/Yx dnoxtPHsiGTfM=; b=qruIMMZ17qN7nibFg0LlqxOf8A+R7s3O7wtdkYYpUpQvC/ y4ByLsbYe16BV8bvd+F7mkjjPiUkEd1zTqtFyQPFqMSIJ0E4SOdl7nWESAXNqyoB PVG4999TwNoogNPOr99hSXvHMiuFKFp1g7AS+POh8CYFVAhB3xcWXqc+AhgV0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=skype.net; h=message-id:date:from :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mx; b=k4eKkmUp8o/aTR54U/HjOH 7AaaVIYm8hz4KOEuJw+oqbc2oBJ6aw5/LQ9MNUSBDsXVS1zv/ahY4Qs4ky0/syu+ x9BqW9BpwHTbuc05sFGFIWZUFhuAbB5iBqq1VQ6tol+GiS68Nu2LTM2JMaOcEvx6 w1vEb+BbZUsq40km/tpTM=
Received: from zimbra.skype.net (zimbra.skype.net [78.141.177.82]) by mx.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 382BC7F6; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 04:52:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E47CE3506F2C; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 04:52:28 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at lu2-zimbra.skype.net
Received: from zimbra.skype.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.skype.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z3LblZwkUHjH; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 04:52:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.10.155.2] (unknown [198.202.199.254]) by zimbra.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E30673506E4D; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 04:52:27 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4E8BC621.3030105@skype.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 19:51:13 -0700
From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
References: <4E8B192E.80809@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E8B192E.80809@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Summary of ICE discussion
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 02:49:24 -0000

I believe this is a correct summary.

Agree with Bernard that we need to ensure that the connectivity check as 
done by ICE doesn't have inadvertent effects on public STUN servers, 
however my understanding of how the ICE credential mechanism works leads 
me to believe that this isn't actually a problem, as long as we are 
clear about what "check succeeded" means when we tell browser vendors 
how to implement this.

Matthew Kaufman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email