IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Proposal to break the ICE impasse

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Tue, 29 January 2019 00:50 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D64F126C7E for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 16:50:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.031
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.031 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.142, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=telurix-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E7eVE43HzJO2 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 16:50:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x536.google.com (mail-pg1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::536]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67C27124BF6 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 16:50:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x536.google.com with SMTP id j10so7993566pga.1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 16:50:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telurix-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=juXFNcJomI3dJVu40qzfrhzDD1lD6sSh3gPxD3jOwhY=; b=njrCbWD248pGudr56ZW+Zj7Cdlok4P4kvHyNQY6e0UDF4bIiGNK6h7elZz41mtl/hG joDJaxiMSvevHESCGnIvru/M4tu15WSD8Hnoiyw7qeyNTot1nSdKDYDUmWcIvg9CD8ur +gPP+qts+POakD02ziEPlUur1quDliDdX+q6u2yS5HPfrBcOFktIc2x/0o+IU4TUhe+H RFyKgCAC0snGL/L+Z6I6JDqWxc1lCtB9Poc4NxmL3jpKLrVplwMkclevdeKJUGxy0TsL YCdrpC5WTq4BZ1qf+ApcoLXajmaKj/yA6B7+dmStuBCJ3gfuU5yViXHEGw1SNpjMSx/z +J/Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=juXFNcJomI3dJVu40qzfrhzDD1lD6sSh3gPxD3jOwhY=; b=kEekBjbgZsxaK4+pdzjOVStWwrxTkbVDPirY67XjJa53bVmUf6Z90x50Eg7S3BRuSw xxiHGE76c39ylWHwQZkZvsN9vjAk3lAUHKlu/FO2zhahsAyP2RdiEGWmpu2kgPRmGaAf NuGcFPg7DWzelmU+5ZIkZ+40eeUJfTv1260GNsEnCKMvoDOFxChHSvHdoerspzv38IPp xLVQwfL6h3ti7ZIEVfOsfIOb3a+ptf0XQ2wTXQUwQtehcEYoiRjx3c1D1wxGCmJ95+oy LuyVfGl4GcNRvYfGhBEMBGeu4KuMD7cIogom1e4kD0Gxb1ZFhUnqB6+gv01Sz1Lahcu3 pDuw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukdXb/YJyu01A9QBMrJWEjsLerxigY3gjlH/+/Q0n7+ftMtSI7Au f5IUFn5t1+Zp4BSgIfIqjV/MjovM2Ik=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6H75PDtkQWJSYehHmLmot0rg+6q8hNUsH/7QH3lFb4RDmHIFAqLwIZXSsTpRwBF6/myO/Pag==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:6d48:: with SMTP id i69mr20965066pgc.215.1548723037755; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 16:50:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-f177.google.com (mail-pf1-f177.google.com. [209.85.210.177]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w10sm42263085pgi.81.2019.01.28.16.50.36 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 28 Jan 2019 16:50:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-f177.google.com with SMTP id c123so8845613pfb.0 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 16:50:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a63:2e88:: with SMTP id u130mr22244780pgu.9.1548723036719; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 16:50:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <97ed2641-8a7e-19a9-be38-a3458ca9212e@nostrum.com> <CABcZeBP9t0SgsHAuENo99D6ffKd7Mw0Xs1vzUCOzSS=WJN5z8A@mail.gmail.com> <HE1PR07MB3161B0F1D2B5AC9DA72DDFAD93950@HE1PR07MB3161.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAOJ7v-3KHi0TUDsQvG6qq-qeNGBsqLxg+NC1c+Nxvgy0ks0d0g@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBNL=sWFfh=zwiuib80HPsno=GzF18gU+z3DrCZTK_PquA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBNL=sWFfh=zwiuib80HPsno=GzF18gU+z3DrCZTK_PquA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 19:50:25 -0500
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAD5OKxspmQTV1dFkeF1qQX_HO6AuX5eMHfC+m5f=PAemrS9e1g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxspmQTV1dFkeF1qQX_HO6AuX5eMHfC+m5f=PAemrS9e1g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000075924205808e2ecb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/P2E1ss2NAKSzz_gvmNQts1E3v7M>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Proposal to break the ICE impasse
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 00:50:40 -0000

On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 7:36 PM Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:

> If we assume that this is a real problem as opposed to a specification
> problem, then I agree this is reasonable. However, so far nobody has shown
> me that this is a real problem, and until that this happens, I'm not in
> favor.
>
> What would you consider a real problem?

Would the fact that SDP manipulation in WebRTC JavaScript client or on the
server to work with WebRTC be considered a real problem or a minor
inconvenience?

Regards,
_____________
Roman Shpount

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email