Re: [rtcweb] Proposal to break the ICE impasse

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Tue, 29 January 2019 12:02 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E1612D4E8 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 04:02:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.042
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.042 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.142, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=aliax-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3l0iqNEqRAHW for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 04:02:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe36.google.com (mail-vs1-xe36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D25BE12DD85 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 04:02:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe36.google.com with SMTP id t17so11764826vsc.8 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 04:02:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aliax-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/dVDN+tJKYX/hgXHerX5ZTL0KqUMK8HTI+vcPcgYNlo=; b=sr8uokGnlAbcPrJgPLvpe6jauD9iz6ZVoSkeb+G8YdV48g740F3dWRnl/HgL6kixqO lI000HVWaKo0WPU9MCd118p5ciMP4txgpLLa01aQowo6mcVqEU+SPKCwuONW/T+1KnyU fWTDjNfTp3FgKs/ffZK741iyorGTnZzxNXaHne3XYz95aDzjNNsZLKyryuqjK3rOMKFt 2htJBFkMjGhjyW2ME70qqFzaanBziO6tjDcYQ2RJS6MrzqocvpQNL35+3c9+8Ex5CNlY L1845kLvY3rWr0LsIhntGTTHQnxvfm4Tr06s6TMFueezcVA+tAqmPSdvDefaFdBmYTIr 1zNQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/dVDN+tJKYX/hgXHerX5ZTL0KqUMK8HTI+vcPcgYNlo=; b=axE3F2zXAepYKHNTESBlmcqqlLLUu6aYzDJItaLiNiP5Y/zlz7PEQTxfMKiMkPUjza uezt+qmNcbBDnvHuz6XSVWVofYALgnZahfnvVbauidjYPChGSof14mnLZt5j4F1qRkxQ qn4PFgkyrkYcdtGUqTtWrPQnvpi1yhPsOFmE4vIy+rpHUy6RHS8ahxbFzwBGhBKmm9pr gB4/jdZT+Oo+XRs4slpt50RPjl+jyQIEYFAxatEMe0r2pV8rO63UQunBRnFaDuFsiEmH 1cLo/LQ9WO8AYmO0/AmNDWWitVgx1XKpNH0yECua3VYRfUqdG3txRVGCUIaldrZtyf1d wGgw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukdTOr4v+BJOejQLtdz7nYt5wevK82dDCaq3bisV3KJOo4Mjzqr1 mxhzXWy8Qa2Lzim4UjMQGHjVun37/pkdXJvyFeFTmA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6Ptj1+IOaV1wAwlrPoNHalWYq+MqZXxQQw5o6EenwdKEgqNNaaPgobDZPbCt1dTcwfZo4O7TthrPSGd6Ow8fQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:3edc:: with SMTP id a89mr10429454vsi.136.1548763374726; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 04:02:54 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <97ed2641-8a7e-19a9-be38-a3458ca9212e@nostrum.com> <CABcZeBP9t0SgsHAuENo99D6ffKd7Mw0Xs1vzUCOzSS=WJN5z8A@mail.gmail.com> <HE1PR07MB3161B0F1D2B5AC9DA72DDFAD93950@HE1PR07MB3161.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAOJ7v-3KHi0TUDsQvG6qq-qeNGBsqLxg+NC1c+Nxvgy0ks0d0g@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBNL=sWFfh=zwiuib80HPsno=GzF18gU+z3DrCZTK_PquA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMDh56CeXRGNSk_r-HrLkDNT5DnYc_FguXOdeccfq=LEMA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPboLf0bLUDTyJArxsPYSnUrULArmsZ9YshQCX+rEvexA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMCwCBHWEEADxVHT2ZbvWEi=bUBJ22icKHpA2p8Kg1fF9A@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfnpj+Pu0Hg05iqHXCwhTefxn_Em7gTnzOXK897fzcyuwg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxvmQHT3TAt_=xCd_JKnPzXfnc=Mej-mr6KMsaKVoBkuSg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD5OKxvmQHT3TAt_=xCd_JKnPzXfnc=Mej-mr6KMsaKVoBkuSg@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 13:02:43 +0100
Message-ID: <CALiegfm_jtv1bV3Ok6j20hkim8e6QxMYPrbbHejqoHnCHjMXpA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Cc: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, rtcweb@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cabd450580979243"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/mTLQfxWnqgzI48M0IakAuOq5mns>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Proposal to break the ICE impasse
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 12:02:58 -0000

Hi, Roman.

In SIP world (and in many others) 5 will happen before 3, so I don't
understand. Do I miss something?

El mar., 29 ene. 2019 10:10, Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> escribió:

> Iñaki,
>
> Please consider the following:
>
> 1. Browser client is placed behind the firewall which only allows TCP
> connections
>
> 2. No TURN servers are configured
>
> 3. Client establishes connection to a server which supports ICE TCP
>
> 4. ICE nomination completes
>
> 5. Client browser app calls createOffer with no options (ICE restart
> option is not present)
>
> Based on the current set of specifications, in this case ICE nomination is
> complete and the TCP candidate is nominated. No other candidates should be
> present in the offer.
>
> Roman Shpount
>